LESSWRONG
LW

by bhauth
1 min read4th Jun 20231 answerNo comments

9

EducationWorld Optimization
Frontpage

Even the most basic aspects of the design and training of artificial neural networks seem (to me) to have large implications for the education of humans. Just the fact that complex information can be represented as a point in a shared high-dimensional Euclidean latent space seems to overturn centuries of philosophy and psychology. People used to argue about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, but now there are massively multilingual language models that render that debate not just resolved but obsolete.

However, when I try to explain something like latent spaces to someone involved in education, it seems to come across merely as: <math people> invented <math thing> that's <interesting for some nerds>.

The people here are interested in both AI and approaches to learning, right? What's an implication that you think the design and training of neural networks has for education? How would you explain it to ordinary people?

New to LessWrong?

Getting Started

FAQ

Library

implications of NN design for education
4th Jun 2023
New Answer
New Comment

1 Answers sorted by
top scoring

meijer1973

Jun 05, 2023

20

I am in education (level about high school/AP macro economics)

possible implications:

  • upskilling : faster learning through better information, more help, AI tutoring etc. 
  • deskilling : students let the AI do the work (the learning, writing, homework etc.)
  • reskilling : develop new skillsets that are relevant to todays world 
  • relevance : in a world where AI does the work what is the relevance of education

The last is the most important I think. What is the place of education in todays world. What should a kid of fifteen years old learn to be prepared for what is coming? I don't know because I don't know what is coming.

One thing I do know. Learning from a machine is a paradox. Yes you can learn better and faster with the help of a machine. But if the machine can teach it to you, than the machine can probably do it. And why would we want to learn things that a machine can do? To learn the things a machine can not do, we need humans. But that only works if there are things a machine cannot do. 

The kid of fifteen wil be 25 in ten years. Ten years is a lot. I do not know what to tell them because I do not know. Love to hear more input on this.

[-]bhauth11mo10

That's a good discussion topic too, but the question I was actually asking wasn't "how can AI be used in education" or "how do AI tools affect education". I was asking about implications for the process of human learning - how curricula and practice should be designed, given what we now know about eg what training methods are more effective for neural networks and why.

Reply
1meijer197311mo
If I understand you correctly you mean this transfer between machine learning and human learning. Which is an interesting topic.  When a few years ago I learned about word2vec I was quite impressed. It felt a lot like how humans store information according to cognitive psychology. In cognitive psychology, a latent space or a word vector would be named as a semantic representation. Semantic representations are mental representations of the meaning of words or concepts. They are thought to be stored in the brain as distributed representations, meaning that they are not represented by a single unit of activation, but rather by a pattern of activation across many units.  That was sort my "o shit this is going to be a thing" moment. I realized there are similarities between human and machine understanding. This is a way to build a world model. Now I really can try the differences in gpt4 and Palm2. To learn how they think I give them the same question as my students and when they make mistakes I guide them like I would guide a student. It is interesting to see that within the chat they can learn to improve themselves with guidance.  What I find interesting is that the understanding is sometimes quite different and there are also similarities. The answers and the responses to guidance are quite different from that of students. It is similar enough to give human like answers.  Can this help us understand human learning? I think it can. Comparing human learning to machine learning makes the properties of human learning more salient (1+1=3). As an example I studied economics and Mathematics and oftentimes it felt like I did three times the learning because I did not only learn mathematics and economics but I also learned the similarities and differences between the two.  The above is a different perspective on your question then my previews answer. I would appreciate feedback on whether I am on the right track here. I am very interested in the topic independent of th
Moderation Log