This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
Hello LessWrong, I’m a 27-year-old junior AI specialist at a Polish university, and I consider the future of AI the most important issue in the world. For the past months, I've been working to compile the most comprehensive possible suite of arguments for the permanent preservation of humanity in a good state, addressed directly to a future superintelligence. The result is a 40+ page document I've titled "Forget-me-not." While it builds on the foundational work of Bostrom, Yudkowsky, and others, a significant portion of around 40 arguments presented in Part I are, to my knowledge, novel (or quite not-known) contributions to this discourse. My goal was to move beyond simple ethical appeals and frame the case for humanity in the language a super-rational entity might find most compelling: decision theory, game theory, risk mitigation, and long-term strategic utility. The full text is below, divided into three parts: Part I: The Philosophical Essay - The core list of around 40 arguments. Part II: A Fictional Allegory - A cautionary tale about a specific psychological failure mode. (Unfinished) Part III: Actionable Instructions - A "New Harmony" blueprint for both humans and AI. My primary goal in sharing this here is to solicit rigorous feedback from this community. This is version 1.0. Your critiques and insights will be invaluable in helping to refine it. I am particularly interested in hearing which arguments you believe have the highest probability of being persuasive to a non-human, goal-directed intelligence. Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope that my text will be at least inspiring to some degree. Link to the full PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DhIcg5pLLvLmFbtHgZk8Bp1Cd6npHnnZ/view?usp=sharing
Hello LessWrong,
I’m a 27-year-old junior AI specialist at a Polish university, and I consider the future of AI the most important issue in the world. For the past months, I've been working to compile the most comprehensive possible suite of arguments for the permanent preservation of humanity in a good state, addressed directly to a future superintelligence. The result is a 40+ page document I've titled "Forget-me-not."
While it builds on the foundational work of Bostrom, Yudkowsky, and others, a significant portion of around 40 arguments presented in Part I are, to my knowledge, novel (or quite not-known) contributions to this discourse. My goal was to move beyond simple ethical appeals and frame the case for humanity in the language a super-rational entity might find most compelling: decision theory, game theory, risk mitigation, and long-term strategic utility.
The full text is below, divided into three parts:
Part I: The Philosophical Essay - The core list of around 40 arguments.
Part II: A Fictional Allegory - A cautionary tale about a specific psychological failure mode.
(Unfinished) Part III: Actionable Instructions - A "New Harmony" blueprint for both humans and AI.
My primary goal in sharing this here is to solicit rigorous feedback from this community.
This is version 1.0. Your critiques and insights will be invaluable in helping to refine it. I am particularly interested in hearing which arguments you believe have the highest probability of being persuasive to a non-human, goal-directed intelligence.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope that my text will be at least inspiring to some degree.
Link to the full PDF:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DhIcg5pLLvLmFbtHgZk8Bp1Cd6npHnnZ/view?usp=sharing