Honestly, I was skeptical (people won’t trust it, etc) but I think it functions great as an argument taunt. “Easy 20 bucks for you if you’re really so sure.”
Definitely has vitality potential.
I’m wondering if it has to function as web3. IMO it can really limit your audience and causes a lot of friction to taking up a bet. Possibly, regulation and/or annoyance of dealing with real cash and payment info reasons?
Consider the following scenarios:
Currently, there's no easy way to set up bets with strangers. The resolution of casual one-on-one bets is predicated on a system of honor. The winner has to trust the loser to pay up. However, many important societal disagreements happen outside one's personal circle, where this trust doesn't exist.
Mouth.is is a Web3 application that allows anyone to create a bet on virtually anything. It offers the following guarantees:
Offering a bet is as simple as filling in a form, putting up your stakes and sending a link. An example:
The attention-grabbing version of the same link:
https://put.your.money.where.your.mouth.is/BIiqZ-fmFL
The home page explains the process more thoroughly.
For the first few years, we’ll allow bettors to appoint us as arbiters for a flat $5 fee, deducted from the winnings. Beware that we always annul bets on sports, horse races, private events, stock movements, terrorism and individual deaths, as well as bets with a deadline beyond 2028. We usually interpret ambiguously worded bets in the taker’s favor whenever the ambiguity becomes relevant.
The goal is to have multiple verified arbiters by the end of 2028.
Fig 1: Even if a response is unlikely, bet offers show you're confident in your disagreement