Chris, if you're open to some constructive criticism, I find whenever I read a post of yours I get the feeling of someone dangling a future in front of me I have no way of accessing. It is great to hear about how your life changed or the lives of your clients have changed, but without also providing any resources on how a reader could accomplish something similar, your posts have the effect of someone saying they found the cure for a disease, but refusing to tell anyone what it is.
Thank you. I started my blog because I was trying to make the post that anyone like me could read and self-cure—but then discovered that, even though readers liked recommendations, ~no one was actually getting better, and ~no one could pass my ITTs on my intended messages.
For as much as I believe in tracking results, I wasn't tracking the results of my attempts at online guidance. So I checked, it was bad. I discovered readers couldn't even self-diagnose (even after I'd spend a dozen hours trying to prevent that specific outcome), let-alone self-cure.
"Brain surgeon discovers patients not cured by reading blog posts about brain surgery."
If anything, sharing scalable recommendations seemed to make things worse by implying there was asynchronous guidance that could lead to total success. I know many people who have been stuck for years because they keep trying to do the self-help thing, and the world is worse-off because for lacking their contributions. I myself lost a few percentage points of my life to this blindspot.
So what has worked for people? Working backwards, every big success story I’ve seen or heard involved ≥1 of:
Which is to say: I only very rarely hear of big success stories involving people who did not have Maslow’s safety, people who relied entirely on self-guided approaches, or people who exclusively followed advice from people who themselves are destabilized.
For the first few months after this exchange, I thought, “Maybe I’m just different and don’t have feelings in my body. Maybe that’s just a weird thing that happens to other people but not to me.”
Nope.
Turns out I couldn’t feel emotions in my body. Sure, I’d get butterflies in my stomach or “know” emotions in my head, but I didn’t notice things like “a feeling of expansiveness in my chest”, “tingling in my fingers”, “tension in my arms”, or “pleasure on my skin”.
Ok, I was living at 360p. So what?
Well, the nervous system is a distributed system, so information must propagate somehow.
“Feelings in the body” seem like a very common way to experience this:[1]
This information flows freely, unless there’s resistance. When there’s resistance to feelings, updates fail to permeate the entire system.[2] And there was a lot of resistance in my system…
The resistance: The unawareness was locally optimal, helping mitigate pain and other risks. Feeling my feelings then made my life worse (locally).
Was the unawareness globally optimal? No. Life was in 360p when it could’ve been in 4k.
At the same time, the numbness numbed awareness of itself. I went like this for many years until others pointed at it.
After I regained the ability to feel in high resolution, I journaled:
Soon I realized that feelings are better described as tuples
(sensation, location)rather than emotion words:(tension, lower chest)(pleasure, arm skin)(expansiveness, chest and shoulders)My growth continued to unfold: Decision-making became so easy it feels like there isn’t even a “me” making the choice. I’m more empathetic and see others’ emotions without hesitation. I can tell people to fuck off without wavering. Insecurities can be noticed and released. I’m much more intuitive. I see more. I hear more.
4k feeling enables 4k being.
Related post: What it’s like to become an intuitive person: Emergent Misalignment coauthor
Related post: How inner work can destabilize your life
See also: Muscle tension as signal jamming
See also: Emotions like loss signals