We know that these words can be objectively defined based on physics. So why don't we have a recognised formal definition? And a Wikipedia article with such a definition?

New to LessWrong?

New Answer
New Comment
1 comment, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 10:15 AM

Can you give a few examples where it's undefined or ambiguous?  I've never noticed a need for more formal definitions than given in a dictionary (for human use) or textbook (for various technical domains).  Note that it DOES mean slightly different things in different topics.  This is true for a LOT of words.