This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, assisted/co-written, or edited work.
Read full explanation
I’ve been experimenting with a wrapper architecture for language models inspired by reliability engineering.
The idea is to replace a single safety filter with three layers that constrain each other.
I ran two simple stress tests: -removing tiers pairwise to see which combinations hold - sequential adversarial escalation across multiple turns
The interesting result was that no pairwise combination maintained system integrity, while the full architecture tended to tighten toward refusal under pressure rather than relax toward compliance.
I’m curious whether people here think wrapper-level governance architectures can meaningfully constrain model behavior, or whether the limitations of wrapper approaches make this fundamentally weak.
I’ve been experimenting with a wrapper architecture for language models inspired by reliability engineering.
The idea is to replace a single safety filter with three layers that constrain each other.
I ran two simple stress tests:
-removing tiers pairwise to see which combinations hold
- sequential adversarial escalation across multiple turns
The interesting result was that no pairwise combination maintained system integrity, while the full architecture tended to tighten toward refusal under pressure rather than relax toward compliance.
I’m curious whether people here think wrapper-level governance architectures can meaningfully constrain model behavior, or whether the limitations of wrapper approaches make this fundamentally weak.