This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
The world is made up of facts, but facts are not identical with things themselves.
Natural facts exist independently of language. Energy exchange, gravity, metabolism, aging— these processes occur without any consensus and do not require naming in order to happen.
Social facts are different. Only those things that require multiple people to jointly recognize, maintain, and enact them can come into existence as such. Law, morality, identity, value, meaning all belong to this category. Removed from shared use, they cease to exist.
These social facts are not discovered; they are adopted.
The repeated use of language stabilizes certain forms. Stability produces the appearance of fact. Appearance is gradually mistaken for essence.
Society operates through consensus. Consensus is sustained through language. Language is sustained through repetition.
Repetition does not generate truth; it generates operability.
The function of rules is to coordinate action. Rules do not describe existence.
When rules are used for collective coordination, they are effective. When rules are used to measure individual life, language undergoes a shift in use.
This shift is not a logical error, but an error of use.
Time is a typical example of this structure. Time is not a natural fact, but a reference system. It is introduced to enable alignment in multi-agent situations: when there are multiple subjects, multiple locations, multiple sources of change, a shared metric is required to synchronize, agree, and anticipate.
Time does not generate change; it only marks it. Change occurs within life and nature themselves; time is merely used to describe the relations among these changes.
The problem is not the use of time, but mistaking a reference system for an entity.
When time is treated as something that “flows,” as a “resource” that is consumed, or as a scale that judges the progress of life, a coordination tool crosses its boundary and intrudes into existential judgment.
This structure is not unique to time. Meaning, success, value, identity all follow the same logic: they were originally tools for collective coordination, yet they are taken to measure individual life.
Life does not operate according to rules. Life is a process of continuous change, non-standardizable, non-repeatable. Therefore, rules cannot describe life.
Rules can guide behavior; they cannot provide meaning. Time can align action; it cannot judge existence. Language can coordinate groups; it cannot define life.
When collective language is taken as a personal scale, conflict emerges.
The conflict does not arise from language itself, but from a confusion of use.
This is where suffering is continuously produced— not because the world is inherently cruel, but because coordination tools are misused as instruments of existential judgment.
Understanding this is not difficult. What is difficult is stopping reliance on it.
At the level of action, language remains effective. At the level of life’s meaning, language must withdraw.
Language can point only this far. Beyond this point, language falls silent. 作者背景预测
The world is made up of facts,
but facts are not identical with things themselves.
Natural facts exist independently of language.
Energy exchange, gravity, metabolism, aging—
these processes occur without any consensus
and do not require naming in order to happen.
Social facts are different.
Only those things that require multiple people
to jointly recognize, maintain, and enact them
can come into existence as such.
Law, morality, identity, value, meaning
all belong to this category.
Removed from shared use, they cease to exist.
These social facts are not discovered;
they are adopted.
The repeated use of language stabilizes certain forms.
Stability produces the appearance of fact.
Appearance is gradually mistaken for essence.
Society operates through consensus.
Consensus is sustained through language.
Language is sustained through repetition.
Repetition does not generate truth;
it generates operability.
The function of rules is to coordinate action.
Rules do not describe existence.
When rules are used for collective coordination,
they are effective.
When rules are used to measure individual life,
language undergoes a shift in use.
This shift is not a logical error,
but an error of use.
Time is a typical example of this structure.
Time is not a natural fact,
but a reference system.
It is introduced to enable alignment in multi-agent situations:
when there are multiple subjects, multiple locations,
multiple sources of change,
a shared metric is required
to synchronize, agree, and anticipate.
Time does not generate change;
it only marks it.
Change occurs within life and nature themselves;
time is merely used to describe
the relations among these changes.
The problem is not the use of time,
but mistaking a reference system for an entity.
When time is treated as something that “flows,”
as a “resource” that is consumed,
or as a scale that judges the progress of life,
a coordination tool crosses its boundary
and intrudes into existential judgment.
This structure is not unique to time.
Meaning, success, value, identity
all follow the same logic:
they were originally tools for collective coordination,
yet they are taken to measure individual life.
Life does not operate according to rules.
Life is a process of continuous change,
non-standardizable, non-repeatable.
Therefore, rules cannot describe life.
Rules can guide behavior;
they cannot provide meaning.
Time can align action;
it cannot judge existence.
Language can coordinate groups;
it cannot define life.
When collective language is taken
as a personal scale,
conflict emerges.
The conflict does not arise from language itself,
but from a confusion of use.
This is where suffering is continuously produced—
not because the world is inherently cruel,
but because coordination tools
are misused as instruments of existential judgment.
Understanding this is not difficult.
What is difficult is stopping reliance on it.
At the level of action,
language remains effective.
At the level of life’s meaning,
language must withdraw.
Language can point only this far.
Beyond this point,
language falls silent. 作者背景预测