LESSWRONG
LW

-4

Why Glacial Melt Is Good: A Techno-Optimist Rebuttal

by Wenitte Apiou
3rd Sep 2025
3 min read
0

-4

This post was rejected for the following reason(s):

  • No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work. LessWrong has recently been inundated with new users submitting work where much of the content is the output of LLM(s). This work by-and-large does not meet our standards, and is rejected. This includes dialogs with LLMs that claim to demonstrate various properties about them, posts introducing some new concept and terminology that explains how LLMs work, often centered around recursiveness, emergence, sentience, consciousness, etc. (these generally don't turn out to be as novel or interesting as they may seem).

    Our LLM-generated content policy can be viewed here.

-4

New Comment
Moderation Log
More from Wenitte Apiou
View more
Curated and popular this week
0Comments

Every headline screams catastrophe: glaciers are melting, seas are rising, salinity is shifting, and “it isn’t slowing down anytime soon.” The tone is always the same: fear, paralysis, inevitability. But what if that framing is not only misleading, but fundamentally wrong? What if glacial melt is not a tragedy at all — but an opportunity, even a good thing, when seen through the lenses of Freeman Dyson’s optimism and David Deutsch’s philosophy of explanatory knowledge?

Step One: Translate Fear into Numbers

The viral claim: “9 million Olympic-sized pools of glaciers are melting.” That sounds terrifying until you actually quantify it. One Olympic pool ≈ 2,500 m³. Nine million pools ≈ 22.5 km³ of water. Spread across Earth’s oceans, that equals about 0.06 mm of sea-level rise.

For scale, Earth’s oceans are rising by about 3.7 mm per year today, a rate carefully tracked by satellites and tide gauges. That’s roughly 3.7 cm per decade — serious, but far from apocalyptic. It’s a number we can plan for. Numbers turn raw fear into explanation.

And as Deutsch reminds us, once something is explained, it can be controlled.

Dyson’s Garden

Dyson argued that Earth’s climate is not a delicate crystal but a garden — dynamic, alive, improvable. Humans have always been gardeners. We divert rivers, build terraces, plant forests, fertilize soils. To shrink from the climate, to treat it as untouchable, is to deny our own nature.

Glacial melt is simply another shift in the garden. New coastlines emerge, new agricultural zones open up in the north, more freshwater is added to circulation. These changes are not punishments — they are challenges that invite cultivation.
 

Why Explanatory Knowledge Changes Everything

Deutsch makes a simple but profound point: humans are unique in our ability to create explanatory knowledge. We don’t just adapt blindly to changes in nature — we understand them, model them, and ultimately master them.

 

  • We know exactly how much water corresponds to 1 mm of sea-level rise: about 360 gigatons.
  • We can model how freshening affects salinity and CO₂ solubility. (Fun fact: adding fresh water slightly increases CO₂ solubility — it’s warming, not salinity, that reduces it.)
  • We can project with high confidence that sea level will rise 0.15–0.29 m by 2050 and 0.28–1.01 m by 2100, depending on emissions scenarios.

Fear says: “It’s all out of control.” Explanatory knowledge says: “Here is the trajectory, here are the numbers, here are the interventions.”

Turning Problems into Projects

Sea-level rise of 3–4 mm per year is not an existential flood. It is a project scale challenge:

  • Adaptation: The Netherlands already spends ~0.1–0.2% of GDP on flood protection, managing even extreme 2100 scenarios. Wetlands and mangroves can buffer coasts naturally. Cities can elevate infrastructure and build surge barriers.
  • Cryosphere interventions: Engineers are modeling sills to block warm water from Antarctic grounding lines, and albedo-boosting covers that cut local melt rates by up to 70%.
  • Climate system levers: Carbon dioxide removal, enhanced weathering, reforestation — all technologies in progress. Solar radiation management remains controversial, but is being carefully studied.

Each “threat” is just another engineering brief.

Why This Is Good

If glaciers never melted, if seas never rose, humanity might never be forced to rise to its full powers. Climate change is the test of whether we remain passive tenants of Earth, or graduate to become active custodians of its systems.

  • Rising seas? We design better coastal defenses, new floating cities, smarter resource allocation.
  • Shifting climates? We develop climate-resilient crops, new water management systems, and geoengineering safeguards.
  • Ocean chemistry changes? We pioneer scalable carbon removal and marine interventions.

Every problem solved here increases our mastery not only of Earth, but of planetary engineering as a whole — a skill set that will matter far beyond this planet.

The Great Responsibility

Dyson was right: we are gardeners. Deutsch was right: with explanatory knowledge, no problem is insoluble. The melting of glaciers is not the end of the world. It is the beginning of a world where humanity finally accepts its duty to control and improve the climate — not hide from it.

That’s why glacial melt is not just survivable. It’s good. It forces us to grow, to invent, to take responsibility. It is not the apocalypse. It is our apprenticeship.