My colleague and I have written a paper, that was initially going to start as a post on here, but after the article was finished we submitted it to an Ergonomics journal, where it was rejected after peer review. We recognise that part of academic publishing is a random number generator, so we've have updated the article and posted it as a pre-print on PsyArXiv and on our institutional repo doi: 10.31234/osf.io/fd3kn_v1
I'm looking forward to your thoughts and feedback, and we hope to integrate these discussions into the next version of the paper. I hope these ideas spark a continued conversation.
Hello LessWrong,
I've been reading posts here and on the AI Alignment forum for several years. Thank you for all the fascinating insights, beautiful tangents and deep learning rabbit holes.
My colleague and I have written a paper, that was initially going to start as a post on here, but after the article was finished we submitted it to an Ergonomics journal, where it was rejected after peer review. We recognise that part of academic publishing is a random number generator, so we've have updated the article and posted it as a pre-print on PsyArXiv and on our institutional repo doi: 10.31234/osf.io/fd3kn_v1
We agree with JanB that many of the brilliant posts here should be on a pre-print server, or even submitted to a conference or a journal.
I'm looking forward to your thoughts and feedback, and we hope to integrate these discussions into the next version of the paper. I hope these ideas spark a continued conversation.