This is a linkpost for https://academic.oup.com/cjip/article/16/1/106/6976053
Third is impossibility of termination, meaning that once activated there is no way of terminating the device.
So the law wont apply to anything that anybody would've actually tried to make, short of prepotent superintelligence. :/
Is the fifth requirement not a little vague, in the context of agents with external memory and/or few-shot learning?
Military UAVs with autonomous targeting already exist. Turkey probably used one. Israel has also been developing autonomous weapons. The Switchblade 600 isn't autonomous, but US defense contractors are interested in adding autonomous targeting to such products and seem to be lobbying against US regulations on that. The Chinese government seems to be strongly in favor of autonomous weapons, but also strongly against literal Terminators a la the movies.
Thus far, the focus has been on autonomous targeting for small short-range electric UAVs, but autonomy is easier for larger UAVs that can carry more sensors and computing, and datalinks are harder over long distances - especially if satellites were targeted in eg a war over Taiwan between the US and a China-Russia alliance.