but u don't know which distribution(s) u are acting in.  u only have access to a sample dist, so u are going to underestimate the variance unless u ~Bessel-correct^[1] ur intuitions.  and it matters which parts of the dists u tune ur sensors for: do u care more to abt sensitivity/specificity wrt the median cluster or sensitivity/specificity wrt the outliers?

ig sufficiently advanced vibes-based pattern-matching collapses to doing causal modelling, so my real-complaint is abt ppl whose vibe-sensors are under-dimensional.

1. ^{^}

   idk the right math tricks to use are, i just wanted to mk the point that sample dists underestimate the variance of the true dists

   also, oops, fixed link.  upvoted ur comment bc u complimented me for using RemNote, which shows good taste.