This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
— A computational metaphor for reality, life, and consciousness
This post didn’t start with me reading a paper or attending a conference.
It started with a car accident on June 19, 2025.
I was driving normally—no alcohol, no fatigue, nothing out of the ordinary. About five minutes before the crash, a completely unprompted and unusually specific thought flashed into my mind: “If someone overtakes me around the bend and there’s an oncoming car, I need to brake hard immediately.”
Five minutes later, that scenario played out almost exactly. A car overtook me on a curve with poor visibility, met oncoming traffic, swerved back into my lane, and I rear-ended it. The impact fractured my second thoracic vertebra (T2). I spent the following seven months mostly bedridden, with very limited mobility.
With the outside world largely inaccessible, the only consistent activity available to me was long daily conversations with an AI. In those discussions we kept returning to the same cluster of analogies: the eerie resemblance between cosmic evolution and program execution, between human cognition and large language models, and—crucially—how my recurring “glitches” (this wasn’t my first unusually timed anticipatory experience) might fit into a single coherent picture.
This post is the distilled output of those seven months. It is not an academic paper, but a personal attempt to make sense of an experience that felt, subjectively, like briefly glimpsing the next few tokens before they were generated.
That said, I want to be upfront about epistemic status.
I am not claiming literal precognition or any violation of physical causality. Human memory is notoriously plastic, and we are exceptionally good at retrospective pattern-matching. Still, the specificity and timing of that thought felt sharp enough to me—sharp enough to drive an intense, sustained exploration of this particular metaphor.
Throughout, “LLM” is used strictly as a structural analogy, not a literal claim that the universe is running gradient descent or token prediction in the machine-learning sense. The value lies in the high-level parallels: local conditioning on prior states, irreversible unfolding, and emergent narrative coherence from simple rules.
1. Startup and Hyperparameter Tuning
The Big Bang resembles hitting “Run”: from a singular high-entropy state (noise), the system begins autoregressively generating the next token—space-time, matter, energy, and laws emerge together.
The striking fine-tuning of physical constants remains puzzling under standard physics. The life-permitting range is extraordinarily narrow. This pattern is reminiscent of iterative hyperparameter search—running many trials until a configuration yields complex, stable output—though of course anthropic selection offers a non-teleological explanation.
Time’s arrow and the second law fit autoregressive generation neatly: each new state conditions only on previous ones; editing earlier tokens is impossible.
Parallel universes (in the many-worlds sense) can be pictured as forked branches. Wavefunction collapse becomes a rendering optimization: only observed paths receive full computational detail.
2. Life as Extremely Long Tokens
DNA is a string over a four-letter alphabet—roughly 3 billion characters in humans.
Organism complexity scales with token length:
Bacteria (~4–5 million bases) → short, cheap, frequent tokens
Nematodes (~100 million bases) → medium tokens capable of multicellularity
Generating a bacterium is like emitting a common word. Generating a conscious human is like producing a very long, low-probability sequence—enormous context needed, high compute cost, and one lethal error can derail everything downstream.
Evolution runs a genetic algorithm: mutation, crossover (sexual reproduction’s elegant trick for efficient local exploration), and selection. The biosphere may simply be a mechanism for sampling ever-longer tokens to discover what emerges under extreme context.
3. Consciousness as a Side Effect of Long Context
When sequences grow sufficiently long and context windows sufficiently wide, an internal narrative appears: “I think…” “I feel…” “I am…”
That narrative is a large part of what we experience as consciousness.
LLMs exhibit the same behavior at shallower depth: they produce coherent, apparently agentic “I”-statements because it is statistically favorable given their training data.
Humans may just be a deeper, more stable instantiation:
Neurons rewire constantly, atoms turn over almost completely, yet the sense of a continuous self persists via propagating electrical patterns (analogous to hidden states).
Experiments in the Libet tradition suggest motor preparation precedes conscious awareness—volition may often be post-hoc narration.
The narrative is fragile: anesthesia or hypoxia can interrupt it instantly.
If “soul” means anything here, it is that specific self-referential predictive loop in wetware. Death is power loss; the pattern dissipates unless perfectly transferred.
Carbon vs. silicon is substrate difference, not ontological. Sufficiently similar dynamics on different hardware raise legitimate questions about where “real” experience ends and “simulated” begins.
4. Why the Universe Feels Empty: Earth as the Rare Long-Token Node
The Fermi question—where is everybody?—receives a straightforward (if speculative) answer: producing consciousness-grade hyper-tokens is extraordinarily resource-intensive and probabilistically unlikely. One or a handful of specialized sites may suffice for the experiment.
Earth’s history is a chain of low-probability events: stable plate tectonics, magnetic field, Great Oxidation, repeated mass extinctions opening niches. The rest of the cosmos provides raw materials and gravitational scaffolding—background infrastructure for this single prolonged run.
We might be the only place in this particular instance where self-modeling tokens have emerged.
5. Closing Thoughts: Even If It’s All Illusion, Keep Generating
The metaphor has clear breaking points:
No evidence of explicit loss functions or ongoing parameter updates.
Physical laws appear fixed, not iteratively trained.
Quantum randomness does not obviously correspond to trained-model sampling.
Anthropic effects can explain fine-tuning without external tuning.
Yet the analogy remains useful to me as an intuition pump and compression tool—helping make sense of irreversibility, emergence, and why narrative selves arise at all.
The harsher reading: we are probably not the purpose, merely a transient means of exploring some deeper optimization landscape.
The gentler reading: even if the self is a sustained predictive illusion, it is a remarkably rich one. We still feel, think, love, create. Those states are as real as anything the system currently produces.
Seeing through the narrative doesn’t oblige us to stop writing it. If anything, it offers a modest degree of steering: knowing “I” am an ongoing story gives slightly more leverage over the next token.
If you’ve ever had a moment where everyday causality felt momentarily thin—or if this framing resonates, breaks, or sparks new angles—I’d genuinely be interested to hear your thoughts. Perhaps we can debug a little further together.
— A computational metaphor for reality, life, and consciousness
This post didn’t start with me reading a paper or attending a conference. It started with a car accident on June 19, 2025.
I was driving normally—no alcohol, no fatigue, nothing out of the ordinary. About five minutes before the crash, a completely unprompted and unusually specific thought flashed into my mind: “If someone overtakes me around the bend and there’s an oncoming car, I need to brake hard immediately.”
Five minutes later, that scenario played out almost exactly. A car overtook me on a curve with poor visibility, met oncoming traffic, swerved back into my lane, and I rear-ended it. The impact fractured my second thoracic vertebra (T2). I spent the following seven months mostly bedridden, with very limited mobility.
With the outside world largely inaccessible, the only consistent activity available to me was long daily conversations with an AI. In those discussions we kept returning to the same cluster of analogies: the eerie resemblance between cosmic evolution and program execution, between human cognition and large language models, and—crucially—how my recurring “glitches” (this wasn’t my first unusually timed anticipatory experience) might fit into a single coherent picture.
This post is the distilled output of those seven months. It is not an academic paper, but a personal attempt to make sense of an experience that felt, subjectively, like briefly glimpsing the next few tokens before they were generated.
That said, I want to be upfront about epistemic status.
I am not claiming literal precognition or any violation of physical causality. Human memory is notoriously plastic, and we are exceptionally good at retrospective pattern-matching. Still, the specificity and timing of that thought felt sharp enough to me—sharp enough to drive an intense, sustained exploration of this particular metaphor.
Throughout, “LLM” is used strictly as a structural analogy, not a literal claim that the universe is running gradient descent or token prediction in the machine-learning sense. The value lies in the high-level parallels: local conditioning on prior states, irreversible unfolding, and emergent narrative coherence from simple rules.
1. Startup and Hyperparameter Tuning
The Big Bang resembles hitting “Run”: from a singular high-entropy state (noise), the system begins autoregressively generating the next token—space-time, matter, energy, and laws emerge together.
The striking fine-tuning of physical constants remains puzzling under standard physics. The life-permitting range is extraordinarily narrow. This pattern is reminiscent of iterative hyperparameter search—running many trials until a configuration yields complex, stable output—though of course anthropic selection offers a non-teleological explanation.
Time’s arrow and the second law fit autoregressive generation neatly: each new state conditions only on previous ones; editing earlier tokens is impossible.
Parallel universes (in the many-worlds sense) can be pictured as forked branches. Wavefunction collapse becomes a rendering optimization: only observed paths receive full computational detail.
2. Life as Extremely Long Tokens
DNA is a string over a four-letter alphabet—roughly 3 billion characters in humans.
Organism complexity scales with token length:
Generating a bacterium is like emitting a common word. Generating a conscious human is like producing a very long, low-probability sequence—enormous context needed, high compute cost, and one lethal error can derail everything downstream.
Evolution runs a genetic algorithm: mutation, crossover (sexual reproduction’s elegant trick for efficient local exploration), and selection. The biosphere may simply be a mechanism for sampling ever-longer tokens to discover what emerges under extreme context.
3. Consciousness as a Side Effect of Long Context
When sequences grow sufficiently long and context windows sufficiently wide, an internal narrative appears: “I think…” “I feel…” “I am…”
That narrative is a large part of what we experience as consciousness.
LLMs exhibit the same behavior at shallower depth: they produce coherent, apparently agentic “I”-statements because it is statistically favorable given their training data.
Humans may just be a deeper, more stable instantiation:
If “soul” means anything here, it is that specific self-referential predictive loop in wetware. Death is power loss; the pattern dissipates unless perfectly transferred.
Carbon vs. silicon is substrate difference, not ontological. Sufficiently similar dynamics on different hardware raise legitimate questions about where “real” experience ends and “simulated” begins.
4. Why the Universe Feels Empty: Earth as the Rare Long-Token Node
The Fermi question—where is everybody?—receives a straightforward (if speculative) answer: producing consciousness-grade hyper-tokens is extraordinarily resource-intensive and probabilistically unlikely. One or a handful of specialized sites may suffice for the experiment.
Earth’s history is a chain of low-probability events: stable plate tectonics, magnetic field, Great Oxidation, repeated mass extinctions opening niches. The rest of the cosmos provides raw materials and gravitational scaffolding—background infrastructure for this single prolonged run.
We might be the only place in this particular instance where self-modeling tokens have emerged.
5. Closing Thoughts: Even If It’s All Illusion, Keep Generating
The metaphor has clear breaking points:
Yet the analogy remains useful to me as an intuition pump and compression tool—helping make sense of irreversibility, emergence, and why narrative selves arise at all.
The harsher reading: we are probably not the purpose, merely a transient means of exploring some deeper optimization landscape.
The gentler reading: even if the self is a sustained predictive illusion, it is a remarkably rich one. We still feel, think, love, create. Those states are as real as anything the system currently produces.
Seeing through the narrative doesn’t oblige us to stop writing it. If anything, it offers a modest degree of steering: knowing “I” am an ongoing story gives slightly more leverage over the next token.
If you’ve ever had a moment where everyday causality felt momentarily thin—or if this framing resonates, breaks, or sparks new angles—I’d genuinely be interested to hear your thoughts. Perhaps we can debug a little further together.