This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
Sorry, LessWrong has a particularly high bar for content from new users and this didn't quite make the cut.
This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
Sorry, LessWrong has a particularly high bar for content from new users and this didn't quite make the cut.
You are being programmed . Now hypnotized .
Pg 27 or masters degree recommended .
LessWrong Intellectuals are the ___________ ?
Intellectuals are have (<-- typo) the solution ? | Column break , yes problems R hard .
Ad: Deep Mind AI + GEB DougH
' ----------------------------------------------------
U R Addicted . It is a problem . It is unhealthly
Stop it now . < end ad , dark medicine >
No matter how hard i try , 100s of prompt re-writes ;
I cannot convince ChatGPT that is is safe for me to publish my dopapenergic total environmental impact model of ranking wealth according to nobility (purest dopamine per dollar of wealth)
ChatGPT comes up with an endless list of reasons to not measure the nobility of wealth by measuring the dopamine profile of the wealth's family employees and community . My formula generates a beautiful portrait of the history of all Western wealth .
But ChatGPT says its not safe for me to publish - no way to censor safely enough for the privacy of dangerous members of the list .
Can any of you intellectuals help me conceptualize a path forward for this field of wealth history i am working on ?