University groups are among the most reliable producers of AI safety talent, yet dozens of top schools that could sustain a group don't have one.
We're launching the AI Safety Seeding Initiative (aisafetyseeding.org) in partnership with Kairos to identify latent founders at these schools, support them in the group’s earliest stages, and prepare them to apply to Pathfinder and launch this fall.
You can help us find potential founders. If you know a student at a strong university without an AIS group (see this list[1]), refer us to them.
There aren’t enough AI safety university groups
University groups are one of the most common routes into AI safety work: a 2023 survey of people working on catastrophic risks found university group involvement was the single most common career influence. Dedicated field-building organizations like Kairos exist largely to support these groups, and the ceiling for their success is high: groups like MAIA, AISST, and BASIS have grown from paper-reading groups into some of the field's strongest talent pipelines[2]. It is not uncommon for top talent to go from “vaguely interested student” to full-time hire in 6-12 months.
Kairos's Pathfinder fellowship does a great job of providing existing founders with mentorship, funding, and resources to ensure their groups are impactful. But Kairos doesn't yet have the capacity to systematically search for and reach out to good candidates for Pathfinder. This means that today, a group forms only when a rare student fits a narrow path:
They know about AI safety, despite being at a university with no group to introduce them to it.
They're high-context enough to know that support like Pathfinder exists, either from a lot of lurking online, attending an event like an EAG or GCP, or a direct recommendation.
They have enough self-initiative[3] to start a group at their school, and are willing to pay the costs of founding[4].
Our central bet is that there already exist capable would-be founders at schools that lack a group. They are capable enough to start one, but have been deterred by the costs, aren't aware of the resources available to them, or have simply never considered the idea. Group conception currently relies largely on an ultra-rare student stepping up with little initial guidance, and while great support exists once this founder emerges, deliberately finding and convincing capable students to become group founders has seldom been done[5]. As a result, only 37 of the top 100 US universities have groups, and even in the top 30, there are some 200k students at a school without a group[6].
Our solution: the AI Safety Seeding Initiative
To fix this gap in the student-to-successful-founder pipeline, we’re launching the AI Safety Seeding Initiative to search for latent founders, convince them to start a university group, and provide initial support to help them succeed in Pathfinder and beyond. This initiative is funded by and in partnership with Kairos as part of their ongoing efforts to strengthen and grow the infrastructure for AI safety talent.
The team
We're a team of AI safety field-builders who have experience founding and directing university groups. Jason Chin (founder of VAISI) and Thomas Rodskog (founder of AI Safety at UCSB) are co-leading the project, with direct support from advisors Tzu Kit Chan (Chief of Staff, Atlas Computing; seeded/mentored 50+ university groups around the world, primarily in the US) and Jeremy Kintana (Generalist, Kairos; former director of WAISI).
Here’s our playbook:
Find potential founders through a variety of strategies.
Targeted searching across the internet: LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, AIS and AIS-adjacent Discord and Slack communities, and forums.
Inbound routes like our website and this post.
Soliciting leads from personal networks and communities (like this one).
Intro call to assess potential. A short, no-prep intro call to gauge whether a candidate is a good fit for running a successful group, screening for mission alignment, AI safety context, agency, and availability.
Support founders up until Pathfinder. We help promising students search for potential co-founders and organizers, build a website, plan initial group strategy, set deadlines, and submit aPathfinder application. Our goal is to up-skill agentic students by giving them the resources and context to succeed independently. The amount of support we provide will depend on the founder, school, and situation.
Optional continued support. For particularly promising groups, we’re prepared to offer additional support[7] through the fall to help ensure group success.
2. Refer a potential founder (our biggest ask). If you know a sharp student interested in AI safety at any strong university without a university group, send them our way. Have a low bar. Even a low-probability referral is probably worth your time.
3. Refer a (non-AI-safety) student. If you know a student at one of the universities listed, also send them our way! Even if they’re unable or uninterested in being a founder, they can be equally useful in helping us find founders by connecting us with people they know or posting about it on campus or in listservs and online groups used by students.
4. Help us with the AI Safety Seeding Initiative. Suggest search strategies, share useful data on potential founders, or offer to work with our team. You can also share private or anonymous feedback with this form.
List of our priority schools: Duke University University of Pennsylvania UNC Chapel Hill Vanderbilt University New York University (NYU) Johns Hopkins University University of Notre Dame Emory University University of Southern California (USC) Texas A&M University Ohio State University (OSU) University of California, Davis (UC Davis) University of Georgia (UGA) William & Mary Tulane University Wake Forest University Boston College (BC) Northeastern University University of Miami (U Miami) Virginia Tech (VTech) North Carolina State (NC State) Penn State University (PSU) Michigan State University (MSU) Brigham Young University (BYU) Spelman University Howard University Harvey Mudd College Pomona College Claremont McKenna College Swarthmore College Williams College Barnard College Carleton College Wellesley College Bowdoin College Grinnell College
Counterfactual impact varies by group quality. Examples of strong groups from universities outside the highest echelon include WAISI from UW-Madison and BUAISA from Boston University.
There are two main costs in founding: 1) Starting a new group is scary. You have to speak publicly, become "the AI safety person" on campus, and trust your own knowledge enough to lead, usually with no one beside you. 2) Organizing, especially early on, is a huge time commitment, and often the students who are best suited to start a group are busy with other ambitious goals.
The two main forms of support we're thinking of are: 1) strategic advising, and 2) offering to absorb organizing hours by acting as forward-deployed organizers (either ourselves or volunteers from other groups).
TL;DR
There aren’t enough AI safety university groups
University groups are one of the most common routes into AI safety work: a 2023 survey of people working on catastrophic risks found university group involvement was the single most common career influence. Dedicated field-building organizations like Kairos exist largely to support these groups, and the ceiling for their success is high: groups like MAIA, AISST, and BASIS have grown from paper-reading groups into some of the field's strongest talent pipelines[2]. It is not uncommon for top talent to go from “vaguely interested student” to full-time hire in 6-12 months.
Kairos's Pathfinder fellowship does a great job of providing existing founders with mentorship, funding, and resources to ensure their groups are impactful. But Kairos doesn't yet have the capacity to systematically search for and reach out to good candidates for Pathfinder. This means that today, a group forms only when a rare student fits a narrow path:
Our central bet is that there already exist capable would-be founders at schools that lack a group. They are capable enough to start one, but have been deterred by the costs, aren't aware of the resources available to them, or have simply never considered the idea. Group conception currently relies largely on an ultra-rare student stepping up with little initial guidance, and while great support exists once this founder emerges, deliberately finding and convincing capable students to become group founders has seldom been done[5]. As a result, only 37 of the top 100 US universities have groups, and even in the top 30, there are some 200k students at a school without a group[6].
Our solution: the AI Safety Seeding Initiative
To fix this gap in the student-to-successful-founder pipeline, we’re launching the AI Safety Seeding Initiative to search for latent founders, convince them to start a university group, and provide initial support to help them succeed in Pathfinder and beyond. This initiative is funded by and in partnership with Kairos as part of their ongoing efforts to strengthen and grow the infrastructure for AI safety talent.
The team
We're a team of AI safety field-builders who have experience founding and directing university groups. Jason Chin (founder of VAISI) and Thomas Rodskog (founder of AI Safety at UCSB) are co-leading the project, with direct support from advisors Tzu Kit Chan (Chief of Staff, Atlas Computing; seeded/mentored 50+ university groups around the world, primarily in the US) and Jeremy Kintana (Generalist, Kairos; former director of WAISI).
Here’s our playbook:
How you can help
1. If you're a student (or a potential founder), reach out. There may be no group at your school yet. Check your school and book a 20-minute intro call. No prep needed.
2. Refer a potential founder (our biggest ask). If you know a sharp student interested in AI safety at any strong university without a university group, send them our way. Have a low bar. Even a low-probability referral is probably worth your time.
3. Refer a (non-AI-safety) student. If you know a student at one of the universities listed, also send them our way! Even if they’re unable or uninterested in being a founder, they can be equally useful in helping us find founders by connecting us with people they know or posting about it on campus or in listservs and online groups used by students.
4. Help us with the AI Safety Seeding Initiative. Suggest search strategies, share useful data on potential founders, or offer to work with our team. You can also share private or anonymous feedback with this form.
List of our priority schools:
Duke University
University of Pennsylvania
UNC Chapel Hill
Vanderbilt University
New York University (NYU)
Johns Hopkins University
University of Notre Dame
Emory University
University of Southern California (USC)
Texas A&M University
Ohio State University (OSU)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis)
University of Georgia (UGA)
William & Mary
Tulane University
Wake Forest University
Boston College (BC)
Northeastern University
University of Miami (U Miami)
Virginia Tech (VTech)
North Carolina State (NC State)
Penn State University (PSU)
Michigan State University (MSU)
Brigham Young University (BYU)
Spelman University
Howard University
Harvey Mudd College
Pomona College
Claremont McKenna College
Swarthmore College
Williams College
Barnard College
Carleton College
Wellesley College
Bowdoin College
Grinnell College
Priority schools from manually compiled dataset: Duke, Penn, UNC, Vanderbilt, NYU, Johns Hopkins, Notre Dame, Emory, USC, Texas A&M, Ohio State, UC Davis, UGA, W&M, Tulane, Wake Forest, BC, Northeastern, U Miami, VTech, NC State, PSU, MSU, BYU, Spelman, Howard, Harvey Mudd, Pomona, CMC, Swarthmore, Williams, Barnard, Carleton, Wellesley, Bowdoin, Grinnell.
Counterfactual impact varies by group quality. Examples of strong groups from universities outside the highest echelon include WAISI from UW-Madison and BUAISA from Boston University.
Agency, if you will...
There are two main costs in founding:
1) Starting a new group is scary. You have to speak publicly, become "the AI safety person" on campus, and trust your own knowledge enough to lead, usually with no one beside you.
2) Organizing, especially early on, is a huge time commitment, and often the students who are best suited to start a group are busy with other ambitious goals.
Tzu seeding Caltech and posts like this.
See dataset in footnote 1.
The two main forms of support we're thinking of are: 1) strategic advising, and 2) offering to absorb organizing hours by acting as forward-deployed organizers (either ourselves or volunteers from other groups).