https://www.lesswrong.com/questions
There's support for it as a distinct type of post, which also creates a distinction between "answers" and "comments" as two separate types of reply.
Or at least... there used to be. I cannot, now that I go looking, figure out how one submits a question post.
The FAQ shows it as a separate option on the dropdown menu, which I no longer see there. Maybe the feature has been deprecated?
Sometimes I want to post things like:
[here’s my initial stab at it]
[but i have no idea if this is right or wrong]
[i'm sure people on LW would love to tell me where i can find the answer or how they think about it]
If Alice knows much more physics than me, learning that Alice assigns 90% to X is obviously evidence for X.
But blindly averaging toward expert beliefs seems to double-count correlated evidence. It also conflates “probability emanating from a coherently-integrated world-model I can defend the gears-level of” with “probability if I was guessing on a prediction market.”
What are
rationalistmeta-conceptually über-coherent ways to think about epistemic deference?People keep telling me “RL is very informationally inefficient.” It only receives a single bit of information (success/fail) over an entire rollout (tens of thousands of tokens!). Meanwhile, SFT gets a bit or more of information on every token.
But RL can make my warm-started model learn to do what I want in like a dozen steps while I can't get SFT to do like anything useful in a dozen steps.
And RL and SFT on LLMs seem to reduce to the same cross-entropy loss anyway, just with a different coefficient. What is going on??
You know... like StackOverflow....
But I notice Q&A doesn’t seem to be the vibe here, nor quite fit with this particular web of knowledge.
So what can one do instead?
Maybe instead of ...
... one could make a ...