Hey there,
Have you run irradiance/dose simulations to see how one single lamp actually behaves?
The output value being incredibly low, and based on the Square over Distance rule, most of the room is actually not getting much. I get that this lamp is meant for air cleaning, but this is really far-stretched, as I cannot see how the air is directed to the area under the lamp, and even if so, hours are required to actually reach proper log-reductions of common microorganisms with such a small mount of UV-C light.
The safe limits for humans (in the US, in Europe it is significantly lower until there is enough evidence to change that) is significantly below values that molds require to be reduced by a 99% factor.
It looks good on paper, but I am afraid that besides the "wow-effect", figures and data will not show this as having any significant impact. Especially when compared to 254nm. For 500$, it is possible to get an upper-unit not directed at people, that will have a UV-C output tenfolds higher than the 222nm.
UV-C light is not just on or off, it takes time and proper doses to reach effect. IN HVAC ducts, there are several kW of UV-C lamps installed just for a standard cross section. This is not because it is not efficient, this is because there are only a few seconds to disinfect the air that is passing along the lamps.
Sorry to be the bearer of such news, but 222nm seems to be rising based on very thin air (no pun intended).
The output value is low, but not that low? I've run simulations with https://illuminate.osluv.org and it really looks pretty good to me. For example, in an 8ft x 12ft room with a 9ft ceiling, an AeroLamp DevKit in one corner at the ceiling pointed at the opposite corner gives you:
The effective CADR varies by pathogen, but the median of these estimates is 400 CFM which is pretty good (far better than any air purifier that is similarly quiet).
(And it does better in rooms with longer sight lines, so this room doesn't show it at its best.)
Far-UVC is something people have talked about for years in a "that would be great, if you could buy it" sort of way. Coming soon, once someone actually makes a good product. But the future is now, and it costs $500.
Many diseases spread through the air, which is inconvenient for us as creatures that breathe air. You can go outside, where the air is too dilute to spread things well, but it's cold out there, and sometimes wet. You can run an air purifier, but cleaning lots of air without lots of noise is still the world of DIY projects. Ideally you could just shine some light, perhaps in the 222-nm range, which would leave people alone but kill the viruses [1] and bacteria. Yes, let's do that!
Last year if you asked "if far-UV is so great, why isn't it everywhere?" one of your answers would be:
This has changed! You can buy an Aerolamp for $500, shipped. Proudly displayed at Thanksgiving:
Here are four silently cleaning a whole lot of air at a dance I help organize:
At $500 this is out of (my) Christmas gift range, but I think we're now at the point where dances, churches, offices, rationalist group houses, schools, etc. should consider them.
(I have no stake in Aerolamp and they're not paying me, I'm just very excited about their product.)
[1] Ok, yes, I know viruses "can't be killed" because they're "not alive", but far-UVC causes them to become unable to infect and replicate which is close enough to "killed" for me.