This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
Introduction
I’d like to propose a speculative model of the universe based on a computational framework. This model replaces the "physical entity" paradigm with a "rendering-through-frequency-synchronization" mechanism, suggesting that what we perceive as physical reality is a secondary effect of underlying informational processes.
1. The Big Bang as System Initialization
In this framework, the Big Bang was not a physical explosion within a pre-existing manifold, but a "system boot-up." This event initiated the parallel output of fundamental bit-oscillations (0 and 1). These bits serve as the true elementary units of the cosmos, evolving into complex, self-interfering wave packets. What we eventually interpret as "particles" are merely localized high-density logical clusters within this universal bit-stream.
2. Observation as "Frequency Linkage"
The "Observer Effect" is reinterpreted here not as a mystical act of consciousness, but as a physical process of frequency synchronization. An observer is functionally a complex cluster of bit-waves. Observation (or measurement) occurs when the observer’s internal frequency "syncs" or "interferes" with the target’s wave packet. This "linkage" forces a definitive computational output from the underlying probability distribution.
3. Matter as Rendering (The UI Layer)
Physical reality—encompassing matter, force fields, and spacetime—is the "rendering effect" produced by this synchronization. "Solidity," "mass," and "spatial coordinates" are the sensory outputs of the interaction between two or more bit-streams. Without this frequency linkage, the "code" remains in a state of unrendered superposition, residing in the background "code-pool" of the universe. In this sense, spacetime is an emergent User Interface rather than a fundamental container.
4. Conclusion and Inquiry
Under this hypothesis, the universe is 100\% informational, and the "Laws of Physics" are the execution of underlying algorithms. I am interested in exploring whether this "Frequency-Sync Rendering" model conflicts with current experimental understandings of quantum decoherence, or if there are existing mathematical frameworks (such as Causal Fermion Systems or Computational Universe models) that map closely to this intuition. I welcome any critiques or pointers to similar formalisms.
Introduction
I’d like to propose a speculative model of the universe based on a computational framework. This model replaces the "physical entity" paradigm with a "rendering-through-frequency-synchronization" mechanism, suggesting that what we perceive as physical reality is a secondary effect of underlying informational processes.
1. The Big Bang as System Initialization
In this framework, the Big Bang was not a physical explosion within a pre-existing manifold, but a "system boot-up." This event initiated the parallel output of fundamental bit-oscillations (0 and 1). These bits serve as the true elementary units of the cosmos, evolving into complex, self-interfering wave packets. What we eventually interpret as "particles" are merely localized high-density logical clusters within this universal bit-stream.
2. Observation as "Frequency Linkage"
The "Observer Effect" is reinterpreted here not as a mystical act of consciousness, but as a physical process of frequency synchronization. An observer is functionally a complex cluster of bit-waves. Observation (or measurement) occurs when the observer’s internal frequency "syncs" or "interferes" with the target’s wave packet. This "linkage" forces a definitive computational output from the underlying probability distribution.
3. Matter as Rendering (The UI Layer)
Physical reality—encompassing matter, force fields, and spacetime—is the "rendering effect" produced by this synchronization. "Solidity," "mass," and "spatial coordinates" are the sensory outputs of the interaction between two or more bit-streams. Without this frequency linkage, the "code" remains in a state of unrendered superposition, residing in the background "code-pool" of the universe. In this sense, spacetime is an emergent User Interface rather than a fundamental container.
4. Conclusion and Inquiry
Under this hypothesis, the universe is 100\% informational, and the "Laws of Physics" are the execution of underlying algorithms. I am interested in exploring whether this "Frequency-Sync Rendering" model conflicts with current experimental understandings of quantum decoherence, or if there are existing mathematical frameworks (such as Causal Fermion Systems or Computational Universe models) that map closely to this intuition. I welcome any critiques or pointers to similar formalisms.