This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
I’ve been iterating on a visualization of a benevolent Hard Takeoff that resolves some of the common anxieties about boredom or "wireheading," while taking the physics of superintelligence seriously.
The core intuition is that a truly benevolent ASI, assuming it solves alignment, creates a discontinuity in subjective experience. We tend to imagine a Golden Age dawning over decades, but if the ASI discovers physics beyond the Standard Model allowing for the manipulation of matter at the substrate level the speed of transition will be governed by its clock speed, not ours.
Since human reaction time is roughly 200ms and an ASI operating at physical limits effectively acts instantaneously, the transition doesn't look like rapid construction. It looks like a jump cut. You are in state A (current Earth), and then, within the same conscious frame, you are in state B.
I call state B "The Lobby."
This isn't a waiting room, but an initial post-Singularity state where biological and physical constraints are removed. The immediate question then becomes: what is the maximand?
The fear is often that an AI optimizing for happiness gives us a heroin drip (hedonium). But I suspect a superintelligence capable of understanding human psychology would aim for Eudaimonia, a state of flourishing that requires the full spectrum of qualia. You don’t just want to feel pleasure; you want to feel existentially "correct," or fitted to your context.
This implies a reality where you can inhabit any role in any ontology. You want to live a life of high drama? You can. You want to learn everything? You can.
The immediate objection here is ethical: solipsism or slavery. If I want to play a role that requires other agents (e.g., a leader requires followers), am I interacting with p-zombies (which feels hollow) or enslaving real conscious beings (which is immoral)?
This is where the scale of the universe or the multiverse accessible to an ASI solves the coordination problem. In an infinite or effectively infinite configuration space with infinite conscious agents, the matching problem becomes trivial. For every agent who desires the experience of leading, there is an agent who genuinely, largely desires the experience of following. For every hero, there is someone who wants the narrative arc of being saved.
Basically the ASI will act as a universal matchmaker. It doesn’t need to simulate fake agents; it just aligns the desires of real agents across the configuration space. No coercion is necessary when the sample size of consciousness is infinite.
It is vital to distinguish this from FDVR (Full Dive Virtual Reality) or any simulation hypothesis! This model is strictly about Base Reality. An ASI with mastery over fundamental physics has no need to simulate a world on a server when it can reconfigure the material substrate itself. This is atomic assembly, not digital rendering. If you find yourself living a life in a different ontology, it is because the ASI has physically arranged the matter of the universe to construct that environment. The air you breathe consists of actual atoms; the photons hitting your eyes are real quanta. It is a manipulation of the territory, not the map.
If alignment works, we shouldn't be looking for a slow ramp-up. We should expect to blink and find ourselves in a place where the physics of the world finally matches the internal requirements of our psychology.
I’ve been iterating on a visualization of a benevolent Hard Takeoff that resolves some of the common anxieties about boredom or "wireheading," while taking the physics of superintelligence seriously.
The core intuition is that a truly benevolent ASI, assuming it solves alignment, creates a discontinuity in subjective experience. We tend to imagine a Golden Age dawning over decades, but if the ASI discovers physics beyond the Standard Model allowing for the manipulation of matter at the substrate level the speed of transition will be governed by its clock speed, not ours.
Since human reaction time is roughly 200ms and an ASI operating at physical limits effectively acts instantaneously, the transition doesn't look like rapid construction. It looks like a jump cut. You are in state A (current Earth), and then, within the same conscious frame, you are in state B.
I call state B "The Lobby."
This isn't a waiting room, but an initial post-Singularity state where biological and physical constraints are removed. The immediate question then becomes: what is the maximand?
The fear is often that an AI optimizing for happiness gives us a heroin drip (hedonium). But I suspect a superintelligence capable of understanding human psychology would aim for Eudaimonia, a state of flourishing that requires the full spectrum of qualia. You don’t just want to feel pleasure; you want to feel existentially "correct," or fitted to your context.
This implies a reality where you can inhabit any role in any ontology. You want to live a life of high drama? You can. You want to learn everything? You can.
The immediate objection here is ethical: solipsism or slavery. If I want to play a role that requires other agents (e.g., a leader requires followers), am I interacting with p-zombies (which feels hollow) or enslaving real conscious beings (which is immoral)?
This is where the scale of the universe or the multiverse accessible to an ASI solves the coordination problem. In an infinite or effectively infinite configuration space with infinite conscious agents, the matching problem becomes trivial. For every agent who desires the experience of leading, there is an agent who genuinely, largely desires the experience of following. For every hero, there is someone who wants the narrative arc of being saved.
Basically the ASI will act as a universal matchmaker. It doesn’t need to simulate fake agents; it just aligns the desires of real agents across the configuration space. No coercion is necessary when the sample size of consciousness is infinite.
It is vital to distinguish this from FDVR (Full Dive Virtual Reality) or any simulation hypothesis! This model is strictly about Base Reality. An ASI with mastery over fundamental physics has no need to simulate a world on a server when it can reconfigure the material substrate itself. This is atomic assembly, not digital rendering. If you find yourself living a life in a different ontology, it is because the ASI has physically arranged the matter of the universe to construct that environment. The air you breathe consists of actual atoms; the photons hitting your eyes are real quanta. It is a manipulation of the territory, not the map.
If alignment works, we shouldn't be looking for a slow ramp-up. We should expect to blink and find ourselves in a place where the physics of the world finally matches the internal requirements of our psychology.