Rejected for the following reason(s):
- No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
- We are sorry about this, but submissions from new users that are mostly just links to papers on open repositories (or similar) have usually indicated either crackpot-esque material, or AI-generated speculation.
- Insufficient Quality for AI Content.
Read full explanation
Over the past year, I’ve been exploring a simple but hard question:
How can we teach future artificial general intelligences not only to think, but to care?
Modern alignment work focuses on control — how to keep superintelligence boxed, safe, or corrigible.
Orbis Ethica approaches it differently: not as a matter of control, but of co-evolution.
If AGI becomes a central actor in human civilization, then it must share the moral substrate that civilization runs on.
That means distributed ethics, transparent governance, and incorruptible self-correction.
The proposed framework builds three complementary components:
These are not intended as philosophical ideals, but as operational engineering primitives for large-scale moral alignment — tools that can scale with compute, not against it.
The white paper expands on how such a system could operate across distributed AGI nodes, forming a Global Ethical Assembly — a kind of moral DAO for intelligence.
It’s an attempt to shift alignment from “obedience” toward “reciprocity.”
🔗 Read the full paper (PDF):
Orbis Ethica — A Framework for Human-Aligned AI (v1)
I’d love to hear critical perspectives on this:
Authored by Orbis Origin, October 2025.
#AGI #AIAlignment #Ethics #OrbisEthica #MoralInfrastructure