Rejected for the following reason(s):
We use physical laws as models to describe regularities in nature.
However, models are human constructions, even if they are highly predictive.
My question is not whether physics is wrong, but whether reality itself depends on these models.
If all our laws and conceptual frameworks fail or change, what—if anything—can still be said to be “real”?
I’m interested in perspectives from philosophy of physics, epistemology, or model-based realism.
We use physical laws as models to describe regularities in nature.
However, models are human constructions, even if they are highly predictive.
My question is not whether physics is wrong, but whether reality itself depends on these models.
If all our laws and conceptual frameworks fail or change, what—if anything—can still be said to be “real”?
I’m interested in perspectives from philosophy of physics, epistemology, or model-based realism.