I have written a paper about artificial superintelligence (ASI) challenges and existential risks. The full paper is accessible at Zenodo (link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20779325). In the paper, I start by reasoning through why ASI might arrive sooner than many may anticipate due to self-improvement, resulting in timeline predictions of 2028-2030 for AGI and 2029-2033 for ASI. I understand these timeline claims are controversial to some and not to others; the reason I make these claims is to have a reference point for how much time we have available to solve the various challenges ASI poses.
Regarding the challenges that ASI poses, I identify five main challenges: 1.) technical alignment and safety, 2.) concentration of power, 3.) international governance, 4.) social health, and 5.) ethical challenges. I argue that major failure of any of these five challenges for ASI carries existential risk. While some challenges like social health are very broad, the difficulty was identifying the minimal number of ASI challenges while still covering all major sources of existential risk. Thus, the social health challenge is intended to cover challenges related to meaning and purpose, human relationships, economic automation, etc. that would not be covered inherently by technical safety or the other previous challenges. The goal is to capture the broad view of the existential challenges posed by ASI beyond only technical alignment which is of course a critical challenge, but not the only challenge.
I have written a paper about artificial superintelligence (ASI) challenges and existential risks. The full paper is accessible at Zenodo (link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20779325). In the paper, I start by reasoning through why ASI might arrive sooner than many may anticipate due to self-improvement, resulting in timeline predictions of 2028-2030 for AGI and 2029-2033 for ASI. I understand these timeline claims are controversial to some and not to others; the reason I make these claims is to have a reference point for how much time we have available to solve the various challenges ASI poses.
Regarding the challenges that ASI poses, I identify five main challenges: 1.) technical alignment and safety, 2.) concentration of power, 3.) international governance, 4.) social health, and 5.) ethical challenges. I argue that major failure of any of these five challenges for ASI carries existential risk. While some challenges like social health are very broad, the difficulty was identifying the minimal number of ASI challenges while still covering all major sources of existential risk. Thus, the social health challenge is intended to cover challenges related to meaning and purpose, human relationships, economic automation, etc. that would not be covered inherently by technical safety or the other previous challenges. The goal is to capture the broad view of the existential challenges posed by ASI beyond only technical alignment which is of course a critical challenge, but not the only challenge.