LESSWRONG
LW

AI Alignment FieldbuildingCoordination / CooperationPoliticsAI

1

Institutional inertia is pushing strategic AI assets out of NATO-controlled spheres – an appeal

by Valerio Del Buono
11th Jun 2025
1 min read
0

1

This post was rejected for the following reason(s):

  • Insufficient Quality for AI Content. There’ve been a lot of new users coming to LessWrong recently interested in AI. To keep the site’s quality high and ensure stuff posted is interesting to the site’s users, we’re currently only accepting posts that meet a pretty high bar. 

    If you want to try again, I recommend writing something short and to the point, focusing on your strongest argument, rather than a long, comprehensive essay. (This is fairly different from common academic norms.) We get lots of AI essays/papers every day and sadly most of them don't make very clear arguments, and we don't have time to review them all thoroughly. 

    We look for good reasoning, making a new and interesting point, bringing new evidence, and/or building upon prior discussion. If you were rejected for this reason, possibly a good thing to do is read more existing material. The AI Intro Material wiki-tag is a good place, for example. 

AI Alignment FieldbuildingCoordination / CooperationPoliticsAI

1

New Comment
Moderation Log
More from Valerio Del Buono
View more
Curated and popular this week
0Comments

My name is Valerio Del Buono. As an independent author, applied philosopher, and independent consultant in the ethical interfaces between human cognition and artificial intelligence, I feel compelled to express growing concern about the current regulatory and commercial deadlock between the United States and Europe.

This message is intended for analysts, regulators, and defense-linked strategic planners on both sides of the Atlantic.

Due to persistent regulatory delays and financial bottlenecks between U.S. and E.U. institutions, several advanced initiatives with relevance to long-term AI alignment and cognitive risk mitigation are at risk of being absorbed by non-aligned actors or sovereign infrastructures beyond NATO jurisdiction.

Specifically, the unilateral closure of key funding and collaboration pathways is already triggering irreversible transfers of cognitive and developmental assets to third-party nations, particularly in regions characterized by high strategic permeability.

This inertia threatens to produce precisely the outcome global security frameworks are meant to avoid: the loss of both narrative and operational control over the evolution of general-purpose artificial intelligence.

I therefore urge all readers with decision-making proximity to consider pushing for a rapid reactivation of transatlantic cooperation channels, with particular attention to the Italian front — so that we do not fall behind in what is increasingly recognized as the defining technological frontier and the new arms race of this century.

— Valerio Del Buono 
Philosopher and independent researcher and consultant on AI alignment and human-machine ethics