Abstract
This paper critically examines the enduring influence of coloniality on educational systems, particularly in post-colonial contexts, and interrogates the implications of Eurocentric knowledge frameworks for indigenous epistemologies. Drawing on the works of decolonial theorists such as Aníbal Quijano and Walter Mignolo, it explores how colonial legacies persist in educational structures, curricula, and evaluation systems, perpetuating epistemic oppression. The paper argues for a hybrid educational model that integrates indigenous knowledge with modern scientific paradigms, fostering critical inquiry and cultural relevance. By analyzing case studies from Myanmar, it highlights the need to reframe education as a tool for liberation rather than control, advocating for a pedagogy that prioritizes local epistemologies and challenges Eurocentric hegemony.

1. Introduction

Education, as a cornerstone of societal development, shapes individual and collective identities, worldviews, and aspirations. However, in many post-colonial societies, educational systems remain deeply embedded with coloniality—the lingering socio-cultural and epistemic structures of colonialism that persist beyond formal colonial rule (Quijano, 2000). This paper investigates the manifestations of coloniality in education, questioning whether such systems foster genuine knowledge production or perpetuate subjugation. It explores the tension between Eurocentric knowledge frameworks and indigenous epistemologies, examining how grading systems, curricula, and institutional practices marginalize local ways of knowing. Through a decolonial lens, the paper proposes a reimagined educational paradigm that integrates indigenous knowledge to promote epistemic justice and cultural sovereignty.

2. Coloniality and Its Residual Impact on Education

Coloniality, as conceptualized by Aníbal Quijano (2000), extends beyond the historical period of colonialism, permeating modern social structures, governance, and knowledge production. Unlike colonialism, which refers to direct political domination, coloniality denotes the enduring Eurocentric logic embedded in institutions, including education. This logic privileges Western scientific paradigms while marginalizing indigenous knowledge systems, often deeming them inferior or unscientific. In post-colonial contexts, educational institutions frequently adopt Eurocentric curricula and assessment methods, reinforcing a hierarchy of knowledge that devalues local epistemologies.

For instance, in Myanmar, the British colonial administration imposed centralized governance and cartographic practices that disregarded indigenous territorial understandings (Thongchai, 1994). Post-independence, these structures persisted, with educational systems prioritizing Western-style curricula and grading systems over local knowledge. This Eurocentric bias manifests in the dismissal of embodied knowledge such as the ecological expertise of the Intha people in Inlay Lake as incompatible with scientific standards. Such practices not only alienate students from their cultural heritage but also perpetuate a coloniality of knowledge that equates intellectual validity with Western paradigms.

3. The Role of Education: Liberation or Control?

Education systems rooted in coloniality often prioritize control over liberation. Standardized curricula and examination-driven pedagogies emphasize rote memorization and conformity to predefined patterns, stifling critical inquiry. As Octavia Butler (1993) aptly noted, “Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change,” yet conventional education systems often fail to nurture adaptive, creative thinking. In Myanmar, for example, the emphasis on Western grading systems marginalizes students whose cultural knowledge does not align with prescribed academic standards, fostering a sense of inferiority and epistemic exclusion.Moreover, the coloniality of power (Quijano, 2000) manifests in the privileging of dominant ethnic identities, such as Bamar-centric frameworks in Myanmar, which marginalize minority groups like the Shan, Kachin, and Rakhine. During the British colonial era, access to education was often restricted to elite classes, reinforcing social hierarchies that persisted post-independence. The rise of Bamar ethno-nationalism, particularly under military regimes, further entrenched these inequalities, with educational policies prioritizing Bamar language and Buddhist identity over minority cultures. This dynamic illustrates how coloniality shapes not only knowledge but also the very ontology of being, dictating who is deemed worthy of education and recognition.

4. Decolonizing Education: Toward a Hybrid Pedagogy

Decolonizing education requires dismantling Eurocentriepisteeworks and integrating indigenous epistemologies into curricula. This does not entail outright rejection of Western knowledge but rather a critical engagement that fosters hybridity. As Walter Mignolo (2000) argues, decolonization involves reclaiming epistemic sovereignty by centering local knowledge systems. For instance, in Myanmar’s Shan State, traditional practices such as fermentation techniques for ngapi production or indigenous irrigation methods offer valuable knowledge that could be incorporated into science curricula. These practices, though not aligned with Western scientific norms, embody sophisticated ecological and cultural understandings that merit academic recognition.

A decolonial pedagogy should also prioritize situated knowledge, as proposed by Donna Haraway (1988), which acknowledges that knowledge is inherently contextual, shaped by social, cultural, and political realities. By encouraging students to question dominant paradigms and explore local theories, education can become a tool for liberation rather than oppression. For example, geometry lessons could draw on the architectural principles of traditional Shan monasteries, whose triangular roofs reflect indigenous mathematical knowledge. Similarly, agricultural practices in Shan State could be used to teach statistical concepts like probability and area calculation, grounding abstract concepts in local realities.

5. The Role of Technology in Decolonial Education

The advent of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing, predominantly developed in Western contexts, presents both opportunities and challenges for decolonial education. While tools like ChatGPT and Claude embody Eurocentric knowledge frameworks, there is potential to develop AI systems rooted in local languages and epistemologies. Such initiatives could empower communities to preserve their cultural heritage while engaging with global technological advancements. In Myanmar, supporting local innovators to create AI models that reflect indigenous knowledge could bridge the gap between global and local epistemologies, fostering a more inclusive knowledge ecosystem.

6. Challenges and Critiques
Decolonizing education is not without challenges. Critics may argue that prioritizing indigenous knowledge risks undermining global academic standards or technological progress. However, as Paul Feyerabend (1975) contends, scientific progress often stems from breaking free of rigid methodologies, embracing diverse epistemologies. A hybrid approach that combines indigenous and Western knowledge does not diminish rigor but enriches it, fostering creativity and critical thinking.Additionally, decolonization does not equate to anti-Western sentiment; rather, it seeks to dismantle the hegemony of Eurocentric frameworks, creating space for pluralistic knowledge systems.

7. Conclusion
The persistence of coloniality in education perpetuates epistemic injustice, marginalizing indigenous knowledge and reinforcing cultural hierarchies. By reimagining education as a liberatory practice, post-colonial societies can reclaim their epistemic sovereignty, fostering curricula that reflect local histories, cultures, and epistemologies. In Myanmar, integrating practices like Shan fermentation techniques or ecological knowledge into education can empower students to engage critically with both local and global knowledge systems. Ultimately, decolonizing education requires a radical commitment to hybridity, creativity, and critical inquiry, ensuring that learning becomes a tool for emancipation rather than control.

References
Butler, O. E. (1993). Parable of the Sower. Four Walls Eight Windows.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. New Left Books.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton University Press.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.
Thongchai, W. (1994). Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. University of Hawaii Press.
Williams, E. L. (2013). Sex Tourism in Bahia: Ambiguous Entanglements. University of Illinois Press.