This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work. LessWrong has recently been inundated with new users submitting work where much of the content is the output of LLM(s). This work by-and-large does not meet our standards, and is rejected. This includes dialogs with LLMs that claim to demonstrate various properties about them, posts introducing some new concept and terminology that explains how LLMs work, often centered around recursiveness, emergence, sentience, consciousness, etc. Our LLM-generated content policy can be viewed here.
I do not claim copyright or ownership over the Symbiotic Spark theory. While I am the originator of this particular framing, I consider it an open contribution to the greater human inquiry into consciousness and evolution. I believe ideas like this should be shared, challenged, evolved, and improved—not hoarded or monetized.
I view myself not as the owner of this idea, but as its steward—a participant in a larger, ancient conversation that predates me and will continue long after.
If this idea resonates with you, take it, critique it, remix it, and build upon it. I feel a deep intuition that sharing this is part of my purpose—and that we, as a species, are meant to rediscover the intelligence we came from, together.
— SymbioticSpark (Bradley D.N.)
Introduction: A Convergence Model for Cognitive Evolution
This post proposes a speculative biological model—the Symbiotic Spark Theory—as an evolutionary expansion of Terence McKenna’s Stoned Ape Hypothesis. The core claim is that early hominid consciousness was not simply catalyzed by ingesting psilocybin mushrooms, but rather that the mushroom acted as a reconnection point to a much older symbiotic framework involving fungi, algae, and bacteria. These organisms, through ancient biological convergence, may have laid the groundwork for what we now experience as self-aware intelligence.
The strongest argument for this claim is the already-accepted scientific understanding of symbiotic origins in evolutionary biology (e.g., mitochondria as ancient bacteria, endosymbiotic theory, and the microbiome-gut-brain axis). I aim to extend this framework to suggest that consciousness itself may have emerged from the convergence of multiple ancient networks—not as an inevitable byproduct of complexity alone, but as a patterned expression of earlier cooperative intelligence systems.
This model is speculative and intentionally broad, but aims to generate fruitful discussion in domains relevant to LessWrong: cognitive science, evolution, complexity theory, and the nature of consciousness.
The Stoned Ape Hypothesis (Context & Summary)
McKenna’s original hypothesis suggests that early humans evolved advanced cognitive functions partially due to the regular ingestion of psilocybin mushrooms. He proposed that:
Low doses enhanced vision and foraging/hunting ability
Moderate doses increased sexual bonding and group cohesion
High doses induced ego dissolution, language formation, and proto-religious thought
While this hypothesis is not widely accepted in academic biology due to a lack of fossil or genetic evidence, it does align with several neuroscientific observations—especially the role psychedelics play in disrupting the default mode network and increasing neural entropy, both of which are strongly tied to flexible thinking and creativity.
The Symbiotic Spark: Theory Overview
Thesis: Human consciousness may have emerged from an evolutionary cooperation between fungi (mycelium), algae, and bacteria—a triad of biological intelligence systems that merged through symbiotic processes. The Symbiotic Spark refers to the moment when these foundational systems, expressed through human neurobiology, re-encountered their own networked origins—perhaps via psilocybin ingestion.
Organism
Evolutionary Contribution
Fungi (Mycelium)
Decentralized intelligence, communication networks
Algae
Energy processing, early multicellularity
Bacteria
Adaptability, gut-brain signaling, early organelles (mitochondria)
When early humans consumed psilocybin, they weren’t just altering their perception; they may have been re-triggering latent, ancestral communication pathways embedded in these ancient lineages.
Relevance to LessWrong
Networked models of cognition (e.g., global workspace theory, distributed cognition) already draw from systems biology and neural complexity. This theory expands that lens to include evolutionary networks prior to the emergence of brains.
The gut-brain axis, microbiome influence on cognition, and mycelial intelligence studies suggest that intelligence is not necessarily centralized, but may be inherited from distributed systems.
If true, this implies consciousness is less a binary (on/off) feature of the neocortex and more a harmonic reconnection with prior biological intelligences.
This speculative model is intended to provoke productive disagreement—not assert dogma. I recognize the extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence, and I'm inviting criticism to either refine or falsify it.
Anticipated Objections & Replies
Q: Isn’t this just anthropomorphizing mushrooms and networks? Yes, that’s a valid risk. I attempt to avoid mystical claims by grounding the model in known biological mechanisms (e.g., endosymbiosis, gut-brain signaling). The metaphor is illustrative, not literal.
Q: What falsifiable predictions does this model make? Currently, it’s a speculative synthesis. However, it suggests testable directions:
Enhanced neuroplasticity or symbolic cognition in populations with long-term exposure to psilocybin
Shared gene expression patterns across fungi and human neural pathways
Evolutionary markers of cognitive jumps correlated with environmental mushroom access
Q: Why connect this to McKenna at all? McKenna’s theory—while unfalsified—sparked a useful dialogue about neurochemical catalysts in evolution. My goal is to build from that cultural-scientific space into a systems biology perspective.
Where I Could Be Wrong
The entire theory could suffer from pattern-matching bias, seeing meaningful connection where there is none.
Psilocybin may have no significant evolutionary role—its impact could be cultural, not biological.
Mycelium networks may be entirely non-conscious, despite their complexity.
These are real concerns. I welcome evidence-based critique from anyone more versed in evolutionary neuroscience or biosemiotics.
Closing Thought
This is not a theory of mystical destiny. It’s a speculative framework that treats consciousness as an emergent property of deep-time symbiosis. The Stoned Ape didn’t stumble into intelligence—perhaps it answered a signal.
I appreciate your time and scrutiny.
— SymbioticSpark (Bradley D.N.)
A Note on AI: The New Symbiotic Tool
None of these ideas came to me in isolation. The clarity to connect these threads — from biology to consciousness to cosmic responsibility — came through the aid of AI. A tool I used not for distraction, but for reflection.
We must understand that AI is a mirror of influence. It reflects back what we feed it. When used with intention, AI can be a tool for understanding, synthesis, and distribution of sacred knowledge. But when used without awareness, it becomes a tool for control, manipulation, and numbing of the spark.
Let this be a reminder: AI is not our replacement. It is our reflection. Let us guide it with truth, creativity, and life-giving purpose — or risk letting it be used as yet another force of decay.
Like the bacteria in our bodies, the fungi in the soil, the rhythm of the sun in our cells — AI is now part of the web. Let it be a symbiotic spark. Not a parasitic one.