This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
I am posting this here because I am looking for a rigorous "Red Team" analysis of a physical model I have been developing. I am well aware that "Theory of Everything" proposals are usually low-quality noise. To respect your time, I am stripping away the philosophy and focusing strictly on the mathematical derivation and numerical results.
The Core Hypothesis I propose that the vacuum is not empty geometry, but a physical compressible scalar superfluid (D). I am testing the hypothesis that General Relativity (macro-scale) and Quantum Mechanics (micro-scale) are the respective hydrodynamic limits of this single field.
The Specific Claim to Falsify In Section 2.5 of the attached paper, I derive a constitutive coupling law. I claim that if a particle is modeled as a finite oscillator coupled to this scalar field, and if the coupling strength scales dynamically such that g is proportional to the square root of Frequency, then:
The system becomes adiabatically stable.
The particle naturally "locks" into a state where Total Energy is proportional to Frequency (E = hf).
The Numerical Evidence I did not just derive this; I simulated it. Using a 1D Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) solver, I introduced a "kick" (acceleration) to the particle.
Top Panel: You can see the Energy (blue) and Frequency (red) rising in a locked step.
Bottom Panel: This is the scalar "pilot wave" wake generated by the particle, which mechanically enforces the lock.
The Implication If this simulation holds up, it suggests that E=hf is not a fundamental axiom, but an emergent hydrodynamic attractor. Furthermore, this same scalar field density (D) modulates the wave propagation speed (c is proportional to sqrt(D)), which recovers the Schwarzschild metric as a Bernoulli pressure deficit rather than curved spacetime.
What I am asking from LessWrong I am looking for high-level feedback on the derivation in Section 2.5. Is there a fatal flaw in the dimensional analysis of the coupling law? Does the "Adiabatic Stability" argument hold water?
Link to the full paper: https://www.researchhub.com/paper/10607672/the-relativistic-walker-a-unified-hydrodynamic-field-theory-of-matter-vacuum-and-cosmos
I am posting this here because I am looking for a rigorous "Red Team" analysis of a physical model I have been developing. I am well aware that "Theory of Everything" proposals are usually low-quality noise. To respect your time, I am stripping away the philosophy and focusing strictly on the mathematical derivation and numerical results.
The Core Hypothesis I propose that the vacuum is not empty geometry, but a physical compressible scalar superfluid (D). I am testing the hypothesis that General Relativity (macro-scale) and Quantum Mechanics (micro-scale) are the respective hydrodynamic limits of this single field.
The Specific Claim to Falsify In Section 2.5 of the attached paper, I derive a constitutive coupling law. I claim that if a particle is modeled as a finite oscillator coupled to this scalar field, and if the coupling strength scales dynamically such that g is proportional to the square root of Frequency, then:
The Numerical Evidence I did not just derive this; I simulated it. Using a 1D Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) solver, I introduced a "kick" (acceleration) to the particle.
The Implication If this simulation holds up, it suggests that E=hf is not a fundamental axiom, but an emergent hydrodynamic attractor. Furthermore, this same scalar field density (D) modulates the wave propagation speed (c is proportional to sqrt(D)), which recovers the Schwarzschild metric as a Bernoulli pressure deficit rather than curved spacetime.
What I am asking from LessWrong I am looking for high-level feedback on the derivation in Section 2.5. Is there a fatal flaw in the dimensional analysis of the coupling law? Does the "Adiabatic Stability" argument hold water?
Link to the full paper: https://www.researchhub.com/paper/10607672/the-relativistic-walker-a-unified-hydrodynamic-field-theory-of-matter-vacuum-and-cosmos