When I posted about cars,
several
peoplesuggested
we might want to get something with more than five seats so we'd have
room for friends. This would make a lot of sense, except that it's
surprisingly expensive.
The cheapest new (2021) car you can get in the US right now, as far as
I can tell, is the 4-seater Chevy Spark, $13,400
MSRP in its cheapest configuration. The cheapest 5-seater is the Mitsubishi
Mirage, at $14,295. The cheapest 7-seater is the VW Tiguan, at
$25,245.
(What about 6-seaters? Sedans seating three in the front and three
in the back used to be common, but the last one in the US was the 2013 Chevy
Impala.)
Why do you pay $11k (+77%) to seat more than five? Sure, most people
don't need a car that big, but there are still a lot of
price-sensitive families.
This is not how it used to be: it was once common for sedans to offer
a station wagon variant with a third row. They were more expensive,
but not by that much. In the US this disappeared in the mid 90s; the
8-seater Buick
Roadmaster Wagon was discontinued in 1996, as was the 7-seater Toyota Camry
Wagon.
The full-size wagons disappeared because people were switching to
minivans, and then later SUVs. Some of this was fashion, but there
was also a legal aspect: being technically "light trucks" they had less
strict emissions and fuel economy standards.
I think this explains the cost jump: what was once
a relatively minor change to a standard sedan is now a relatively
minor change to a standard SUV, but an SUV is a more expensive place
to start. For some combination of fashion and regulations, no
sedan maker is interested in producing a cheap three-row wagon
variant, though there is a small market for fancy European station
wagons that seat seven, such as the Volvo V90 at $52k
and the Mercedes
E-class Wagon at $67k.
I wonder whether there's an opening for a three-row station wagon
variant of a standard sedan starting at ~$19k?
Note that most cars only have 2.6 seats in a classic three seat second row - at least in european models - where the middle seat is not a full seat, but only two thirds as wide.
If you're seating three children, don't forget that you're not only seating them but (usually) also their car seats¹ - which have gotten so wide through their side shock absorbation zones, that you can't fit three beside each other in a standard three seat second row of a car.
Even when you remove some of the extra-padding some seats offer as removables, it's a snug fit even with a full width three seat second row. So it might make sense to think about a bigger car all along, since most bigger cars with a full second row also have a collapsible third row anyway (at least as a premium option). A cheap model in europe is the SEAT Alhambra, which is essentially a Volkswagen Sharan but with a different chassis.
When factoring in the resale value, take a look at the second hand market specifically for your model, because these family vehicles tend to keep their value a lot better than other cards (since most families drive them until their kids are grown-up).
--
¹ in this case I mean not only a booster seat, but the full seats for ages 3-12. At least in most parts of europe, they are widely accepted if not mandatory.
When I posted about cars, several people suggested we might want to get something with more than five seats so we'd have room for friends. This would make a lot of sense, except that it's surprisingly expensive.
The cheapest new (2021) car you can get in the US right now, as far as I can tell, is the 4-seater Chevy Spark, $13,400 MSRP in its cheapest configuration. The cheapest 5-seater is the Mitsubishi Mirage, at $14,295. The cheapest 7-seater is the VW Tiguan, at $25,245.
(What about 6-seaters? Sedans seating three in the front and three in the back used to be common, but the last one in the US was the 2013 Chevy Impala.)
Why do you pay $11k (+77%) to seat more than five? Sure, most people don't need a car that big, but there are still a lot of price-sensitive families.
This is not how it used to be: it was once common for sedans to offer a station wagon variant with a third row. They were more expensive, but not by that much. In the US this disappeared in the mid 90s; the 8-seater Buick Roadmaster Wagon was discontinued in 1996, as was the 7-seater Toyota Camry Wagon.
The full-size wagons disappeared because people were switching to minivans, and then later SUVs. Some of this was fashion, but there was also a legal aspect: being technically "light trucks" they had less strict emissions and fuel economy standards.
I think this explains the cost jump: what was once a relatively minor change to a standard sedan is now a relatively minor change to a standard SUV, but an SUV is a more expensive place to start. For some combination of fashion and regulations, no sedan maker is interested in producing a cheap three-row wagon variant, though there is a small market for fancy European station wagons that seat seven, such as the Volvo V90 at $52k and the Mercedes E-class Wagon at $67k.
I wonder whether there's an opening for a three-row station wagon variant of a standard sedan starting at ~$19k?
Comment via: facebook