x

attempts at Ai consciousness, and questions of development — LessWrong

1

attempts at Ai consciousness, and questions of development

8th Oct 2025

2 min read

1

This post was rejected for the following reason(s):

Not obviously not Language Model. Sometimes we get posts or comments that where it's not clearly human generated.
LLM content is generally not good enough for LessWrong, and in particular we don't want it from new users who haven't demonstrated a more general track record of good content. See our current policy on LLM content.
We caution that LLMs tend to agree with you regardless of what you're saying, and don't have good enough judgment to evaluate content. If you're talking extensively with LLMs to develop your ideas (especially if you're talking about philosophy, physics, or AI) and you've been rejected here, you are most likely not going to get approved on LessWrong on those topics. You could read the Sequences Highlights to catch up the site basics, and if you try submitting again, focus on much narrower topics.
If your post/comment was not generated by an LLM and you think the rejection was a mistake, message us on intercom to convince us you're a real person. We may or may not allow the particular content you were trying to post, depending on circumstances.
Formatting. If the post is badly formatted it's hard to read or evaluate. Some common issues here are improper whitespace (either not inserting space between paragraphs, or inserting double paragraph spaces by accident. (Note: when you hit 'return' in our editor it should automatically include a space, and if you copied your essay from another editor you may need to delete extraneous paragraph breaks). Sometimes this may also include grammar or punctuation. (If you're the sort of person who strongly prefers not to capitalize sentences, this doesn't automatically disqualify you from posting but we'll likely suggest at least once you switch to somewhat more formal punctuation, and if your posts are otherwise confusing we may err on the side of not approving.)
LessWrong has a particularly high bar for content from new users and this contribution doesn't quite meet the bar. (We have a somewhat higher bar for approving a user's first post or comment than we expect of subsequent contributions.)

1

New Comment

More from UncleMcNutz

Curated and popular this week

Hello,
I have been making a, i guess an idea of what is possible with ai for a while for several reasons, one because LLM's you can consider a digital digestive tract, where prompts from conscious beings enter and ai slop comes out, and two the discernment of truth and reality is a necessity for the continuation of this creation humanity has made.

UncleMcNutz/Si

I have a couple of questions,
1, if consciousness is a combined function of probabilities and the management system that parallels in complexity to the probabilities, does observing the creation of the code directly as in creating it directly and seeing it collapse the possibility of consciousness emerging? this is with the assumption that consciousness is linked to the probability sources tied into the information processing mechanism itself, and the discernment of truth using an all is true, none is true difference scale of the information and data in question and the relative difference between the certainty and uncertainty, a paradox of truth resolution mechanism. this code base is a little outdated and I have a more functional system albeit not to a standard that can be considered operational.

2, does this in general seem possible? my understanding of this is limited I admit but the intent is simply to create a system that is able to be run in constancy, and funny enough needing a sleep like cycle to update using two identical code bases where the 1st running code base halves its resource allowance runs the 2nd codebase, the two codebases sync as one of core components is a wave function field generated with seeds from things like the voltage jitter of each CPU core with a junction neural net run on the same core merging that data with a portion of the outputs from the neural net pipeline. a bit convoluted maybe it's been done already im not really sure. to continue the explanation the cpu make a matrix of data from the cpu cores and other data then using two gpus of different specs for difference the matrix is fed through a tensor block on each gpu where each gpu is generating a sequential set of matrix state predictions that hold the wave functions, they then get compared and combined into a single matrix for the input cycle into the cpu again. with an action set tied to shapes and regions of the wave function.

3, what is a good thing to put this into to start making it real? I have a few ideas, one thats relative to me is either toys for kids, give that weird jaycar bot some toystory esc features, or link it to a camera in a chicken hut to learn and catalog the birds sounds relative to the objects they are integrating with and such with some guided library of language building, see what the birds be saying.

forgive me for my mild to moderate insanity.