Writing seems likely in a "LLM sycophonancy trap". Since early 2025, we've been seeing a wave of users who seem to have fallen into a pattern where, because the LLM has infinite patience and enthusiasm for whatever the user is interested in, they think their work is more interesting and useful than it actually is. Generally these posts write using vague language that sounds impressive but doesn't say anything specific/concrete enough to be useful. 

If we've send you this rejection, we highly recommend stopping talking much to LLMs and go talk to some humans in your real life. Generally, the ideas presented in these posts are not, like, a few steps away from being publishable on LessWrong. 

If you want to contribute on LessWrong or to AI discourse, I recommend starting over and focusing on much smaller, more specific questions, about things other than language model chats or deep physics or metaphysics theories (consider writing Fact Posts that focus on concrete of a very different domain).

I recommend reading the Sequence Highlights, if you haven't already, to get a sense of the background knowledge we assume about "how to reason well" on LessWrong.