No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Difficult to evaluate, with potential yellow flags.
Read full explanation
Draft: A Responsibility-Based Economy – Seeking constructive critique on a new (utopian?) alternate economic framework
Status: Draft manuscript in progress – open to feedback, criticism, and improvement
Working Title: Manifesto for a Responsibility and Outcome-Based Economy
This is a draft of a proposal to explore how humans and AI might coexist in a post-labor economy. It proposes a shift from employment-based to a system where people (and AIs) contribute by taking on responsibilities—using a dynamic token system (“R-Tokens”).
This is work-in-progress. I’m seeking critique and input, especially from readers that explore post-AI society.
Core Premise
AI and robotics are dissolving the foundation of labor-based economic inclusion.
Universal Basic Income (UBI) risks turning people into resouce wasters instead of empowered contributors.
We need an alternative system that maintains meaning, fairness, and distributed control in a world where traditional employment is no longer viable
This is an opportunity to fix the limitations of capitalism and better redistribute wealth.
Summary
Responsibility Markets: Humans and AIs earn non-transferable, expiring “R-Tokens” for completing verifiable responsibilities (governance, innovation, care, infrastructure, etc.).
R-Tokens can’t be hoarded, sold, or inherited. They decay over time, incentivizing continuous contribution
Artificial agents can earn responsibilities, but with limits - and they have no permanent control, with periodic review, and possible human override.
Responsibilities are assigned through open competition, with safeguards to ensure that competence determines influence.
Inspiration and Sources
The book synthesizes ideas from many online sources and inspirations. It is not claimed as a unique idea but rather the application of multiple ideas to solve the problem at hand.
AI alignment discussions were used.
I’d Love Your Input:
Is the token system realistic or vulnerable to gaming/manipulation?
Would this produce actual fairness, or just a new elite class of contributors?
Can responsibility-based systems scale without collapsing into bureaucracy?
How could AI integration be made safe, useful, and non-exploitative?
What’s the sharpest counterargument or failure mode I’m missing?
Read the Draft - in pdf
You can download or browse the first chapters of the draft here:
Feel free to leave public comments, message me directly, or even propose counter-frameworks. I’d welcome collaboration, hard questions, or even “this won’t work and here’s why” style feedback.
Draft: A Responsibility-Based Economy – Seeking constructive critique on a new (utopian?) alternate economic framework
Status: Draft manuscript in progress – open to feedback, criticism, and improvement
Working Title: Manifesto for a Responsibility and Outcome-Based Economy
This is a draft of a proposal to explore how humans and AI might coexist in a post-labor economy. It proposes a shift from employment-based to a system where people (and AIs) contribute by taking on responsibilities—using a dynamic token system (“R-Tokens”).
This is work-in-progress. I’m seeking critique and input, especially from readers that explore post-AI society.
Core Premise
Summary
Inspiration and Sources
The book synthesizes ideas from many online sources and inspirations. It is not claimed as a unique idea but rather the application of multiple ideas to solve the problem at hand.
AI alignment discussions were used.
I’d Love Your Input:
Read the Draft - in pdf
You can download or browse the first chapters of the draft here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Uit1JAoaua0o9sPlkDl3Z76ODOZX1jb/view?usp=drive_link
If You’re Interested
Feel free to leave public comments, message me directly, or even propose counter-frameworks. I’d welcome collaboration, hard questions, or even “this won’t work and here’s why” style feedback.