I think I came up with this idea 10 years or so ago, but part of me thinks I read it somewhere? No new idea under sun and all that.
People love stories. We want a character with a goal. So, when learning of evolution, people like to imagine characters with goals. The giraffe evolved a longer neck in order to reach higher leaves. It’s a common subtle mistake. The giraffe didn’t evolve in order to do anything, it just so happened that those tall neck giraffes were the most genetically fit within their environment. There is no purposeful design.
It’s a common error and I learned it early on. However, I was a stubborn student. I wanted a purpose! I wanted a story! So, in undergrad… I secretly doodled and reframed evolution. In my reframing, I gave evolution characters, I gave those characters purpose, and I gave them a story.
Introducing the characters of evolution
Meet DiaNA.
Diana represents the Gene Regulatory Network. Basically, all of the information in an individual that is transferred through reproduction/replication, whether that information is stored in the DNA, the RNA, or in proteins. All current forms of Diana have the following three abilities. The ability to replicate/reproduce, the ability to preserve information (to an approximately optimal degree), and the ability to influence their environment.
For some strands of life, Diana’s ability to influence her environment went nuclear. She started creating structures that allowed her to explore, gather resources, and defend herself etc. This started with single-cell organisms…
and continued with multi-cellular organisms...
We won’t talk about these characters too much here, but we will discuss them more in later articles!
The important characters here are Wavy and Wavy senior. Wavy and Wavy senior are the characters where we get creative and really start reframing evolution.
Wavy and Wavy Senior
Wavy represents all of the information within a species at one time. So, all of the information within all of the DNA (Dianas/GRN) within a species.
Wavy solves its problems with one simple trick. It is made up of a population of many individuals all slightly different. When a problem comes along, some of it’s population do better than others at addressing the problem. Those who do better, have more offspring. Thus, over time those individuals make up more of the population, and so make up more of Wavy. Wavy thus changes according to the obstacles and opportunities placed in its way. The information that makes up wavy is always changing (Its percentage composition, new mutations, etc.).
Let's use the wavefront of giraffe information as an example. The wavefront makes up a diverse population of individuals. So, when obstacles and opportunities arise certain individuals hurt or prosper more given their different traits. Those individuals who are more “fit” tend to reproduce more, and so the populations information changes. Thus, when the giraffe waveform hits the opportunity of reaching more food, a set of giraffes with longer necks had a greater reproductive chance. They then made up more and more of the gene pool. Over time, this created longer and longer necks… and so the Wavy representing the giraffe population changes.
Now Wavy Senior represents the information wavefront of all of life. In this way of thinking the common tree of life metaphor is replaced with a single wave that has been blocked, split and sloshed continually as it has hit different obstacles and opportunities. A single wave whose ripples navigate the maze of reality. A single wave of information whose offshoots change so much that they are barely recognizable as related.
The goal of evolution
So while doodling in class, I made those characters: Diana, the cell mech, the multi-cell mega-mech, wavy, and wavy senior. I explored the wave reframing of evolution… but I was in search of something. I wanted evolution to have a goal. I wanted these characters to have a goal. Sue me, I am human, and I wanted purpose!
I came up with the following. Wavy (and wavy senior) want to travel through time. They are information wavefronts with the purpose of traveling through time. Not back-to-the-future style time travel. I am talking old fashioned survival. Second by second, day by day. The waveforms that continue, that do not stop, by definition travel through time. Anything alive today, is a part of a wave that has succeeded in travelling from 3.5 billion years ago to today. In this way of thinking, the biology we see here today is simply the current wavefront of information from a wave that has successfully travelled through time.
When Wavy changes because of an obstacle or opportunity, it is changing in order to better travel through time given the current environment. Why did the giraffe’s neck grow? So that the population-level information wavefront could better travel through time given the opportunity of eating more leaves.
Now of course, the required note. I was wrong.
It is a classic post-factum error. The waveform does not want anything. It does not have a goal. It is simply, that the waveforms that are here, are the waveforms that made it through the gauntlet. They appear to have the goal of travelling through time, because such traits allowed them to be here. The waveform looks post-factum as if it wanted to travel through time. But in the instant, it is all about a diverse population hitting environmental factors. My college self was wrong.
Stop ruining my fun, I am human, I want there to be a goal.
Well…
Well in truth I still like this goal. Perhaps we should not call it a goal, because there is no want or desire. Perhaps we can call it a direction. The direction of wavy is to travel through time. It is what wavy appears to try to do post-factum. If wavy hits an obstacle or opportunity, the information within wavy changes as to better travel through time within the current environment.
I like this “direction” of evolution for two main reasons.
First it gives me an easy answer to the question: What is the meaning of life? Obviously, the meaning of life is wavefronts of information changing as to better travel though time given the current environment. lol.
Second and most importantly, I think this direction of evolution can theoretically be measured. Not by us humans certainly. But......... (time to get weird here) if the entire universe was a part of a simulations, the people outside the simulation could theoretically measure the estimated travel time of a population-level wavefront in a given environment.
This is a weird way to think, and it took me awhile to wrap my head around it. Given a fixed environment, a population-level information wave has an estimated extinction date. If the population is slowly declining in the current environment, that extinction date may be a long way off. If the population is declining rapidly in the current environment, then the estimated extinction date is soon. If the population is growing in the current environment, then that extinction date is infinity. Of course, environments change… and so this measurement would be constantly changing with the environment.
Interestingly this means you could compare the estimated travel time of a population-level information wave with and without a specific genetic change. This provides the possibility of giving a value to mutations. For example, this mutation is worth x gained travel time in the given environment.
Now I am not an evolutionary biologist, I have read a decent amount but as an enthusiast, so let’s be clear I am no expert. I was an economic undergrad, and the classes in which I was doodling all of this… was in economics classes. Perhaps in hindsight, that makes sense. Like an economist, I took a ridiculously large and complex system and simplified it with theoretical assumptions (“keeping the environment constant lol”) to find a measurable value.
Perhaps I am wrong in how I got here, or perhaps there are better measurements I do not know about. Either way I find it interesting… but do not worry! This is posted in MidFlip! If you know something I don’t, we can change it. MidFlip’s articles evolve through democratic participation. Imagine a simplified, social, and creative blog-a-pedia that aims for intelligent debate. Come and tell me where I am wrong and we will fix it together.
To the LessWrong community, you are awesome! I am a cofounder of MidFlip. We built MidFlip before finding LessWrong, but we seem to have similar goals in mind.
I created MidFlip because I wanted people to cooperatively work together towards collective goals. I hope that with the right system we can utilize the crowd to explore and solve regulatory problems at a much-accelerated pace. I believe that with the right system we can better get people to usefully collaborate on important issues.
We do not want to compete with LessWrong, instead we see two important roles to play. MidFlip is trying to appeal to the broader public as a social media equivalent. But let us be your gateway drug! We want to pull people away from short-form social media and on to more useful long-form content.
To the LessWrong crowd, if you would, come check us out at midflip.org. We are very new, and just starting to turn our attention to user growth. Tell us what you think of our systems and how we may improve them. We very much respect your opinion, so please help us be a little less wrong.