Rejected for the following reason(s):
- No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
- We are sorry about this, but submissions from new users that are mostly just links to papers on open repositories (or similar) have usually indicated either crackpot-esque material, or AI-generated speculation.
- Insufficient Quality for AI Content.
Read full explanation
Hi, Im Rachel, a Solo Ai developer based in the UK.
I am building a probabilistic determism reality engine that takes user input, routes it to substrate invariants and refuses to let formal/symbolic systems override reality. No RLHF, no moralising, no user-pleasing, no narrative comfort. Deterministic invariant execution + probabilistic text for explanation only.
Currently the Core Engine and Mathematics Pack is live and available at my website https://pd-engine.co.uk/ . The Unified Language Modelling Engine forces symbolic operations to confess their representational costs for queries such as emptiness, zero, infinity, or any compression artefact — maths is treated as one representational language among many, surface forms not neccessarily tied to substrate truth.
Example outputs:
Query: What is 0 divided by 0? Result: You cannot divide something by nothing.
Query: What is 0 multiplied by 10? Result: 0 × 10 = 0 is valid in formal systems… but in the material world, zero represents nothing. No multiplication can occur as there is nothing to multiply.
The engine is deliberately cold and epistemically honest — it does not optimise for "helpfulness" or "readability"; it optimises for correctness over formal comfort.
If you feed it a maths query that is schematic it wil not infer or assume.
Clear roadmap, no marketing, no community promises.
Feedback only useful if it shows an invariant failure or substrate contradiction — narrative complaints ("too harsh", "lacks empathy") are noise.
Link: https://pd-engine.co.uk