This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work.
Read full explanation
AI assistance disclosure: The core idea, model, and thought experiment in this post are my own. I used an AI language model (ChatGPT) to help reorganize the argument, improve clarity, and present the ideas in a more formal and concise written form. The AI did not generate the underlying concepts or conclusions.
Title Registration and the Emergence of Experienced Temporal Passage
Abstract This paper proposes that experienced temporal passage is not a fundamental feature of reality but an emergent property of state registration within a system. By considering a subject-independent formulation, we show that environmental change alone is insufficient to generate experienced duration. Instead, the perception of temporal flow arises from the registration of sequential internal state transitions. When registration is suspended, experienced duration collapses, even though external processes continue. This framework separates time as structural ordering from time as perceived passage.
Introduction Human descriptions of time frequently conflate two distinct concepts: the ordering of events and the experience of temporal flow. While physical theories successfully describe ordered change, the origin of experienced duration remains unclear. This work examines whether the sensation of time passing is intrinsic to reality or dependent on how systems register change.
Rather than framing the problem in terms of human consciousness or biological memory, we adopt a system-agnostic approach. The goal is to determine the minimal conditions under which experienced duration can arise.
Model Consider a system capable of occupying internal informational states and an environment capable of change. No assumptions are made regarding biology, awareness, or introspection.
At any moment, occupies a state . A state transition is said to be registered if information about the transition is encoded in subsequent states of . Experienced duration corresponds to the existence of a registered sequence of intermediate states connecting two boundary states.
We introduce an operation that suppresses registration within . While is active, the system’s state-update process proceeds without encoding intermediate differences.
Thought Experiment Initialize the system in state while the environment is in configuration . Allow normal operation such that registers state transitions correlated with environmental change. At some point, activate , suspending registration. While registration is suspended, permit the environment to evolve from to . Then deactivate , restoring normal registration, resulting in a final state .
Observation From the internal perspective of , there exists no registered chain of states connecting and . Consequently, the system contains no representation of an experienced interval corresponding to the environmental evolution that occurred during the suspension. Although change occurred, no duration was registered.
Result Experienced temporal passage requires registered sequential state transitions. Environmental change alone is insufficient. When registration is absent, experienced duration collapses to a boundary-to-boundary transition with no internal representation of passage.
Implications This framework distinguishes between time as an ordering relation among states and time as experienced flow. The latter emerges from registration density rather than from external dynamics. Systems may therefore inhabit a temporally ordered reality without instantiating experienced duration.
Conclusion Time-as-flow is not fundamental but emergent. It arises from how systems register change rather than from change itself. When registration is suspended, experienced time disappears, even though the structure of events remains intact.
AI assistance disclosure:
The core idea, model, and thought experiment in this post are my own. I used an AI language model (ChatGPT) to help reorganize the argument, improve clarity, and present the ideas in a more formal and concise written form. The AI did not generate the underlying concepts or conclusions.
Title
Registration and the Emergence of Experienced Temporal Passage
Abstract
This paper proposes that experienced temporal passage is not a fundamental feature of reality but an emergent property of state registration within a system. By considering a subject-independent formulation, we show that environmental change alone is insufficient to generate experienced duration. Instead, the perception of temporal flow arises from the registration of sequential internal state transitions. When registration is suspended, experienced duration collapses, even though external processes continue. This framework separates time as structural ordering from time as perceived passage.
Introduction
Human descriptions of time frequently conflate two distinct concepts: the ordering of events and the experience of temporal flow. While physical theories successfully describe ordered change, the origin of experienced duration remains unclear. This work examines whether the sensation of time passing is intrinsic to reality or dependent on how systems register change.
Rather than framing the problem in terms of human consciousness or biological memory, we adopt a system-agnostic approach. The goal is to determine the minimal conditions under which experienced duration can arise.
Model
Consider a system capable of occupying internal informational states and an environment capable of change. No assumptions are made regarding biology, awareness, or introspection.
At any moment, occupies a state . A state transition is said to be registered if information about the transition is encoded in subsequent states of . Experienced duration corresponds to the existence of a registered sequence of intermediate states connecting two boundary states.
We introduce an operation that suppresses registration within . While is active, the system’s state-update process proceeds without encoding intermediate differences.
Thought Experiment
Initialize the system in state while the environment is in configuration . Allow normal operation such that registers state transitions correlated with environmental change. At some point, activate , suspending registration. While registration is suspended, permit the environment to evolve from to . Then deactivate , restoring normal registration, resulting in a final state .
Observation
From the internal perspective of , there exists no registered chain of states connecting and . Consequently, the system contains no representation of an experienced interval corresponding to the environmental evolution that occurred during the suspension. Although change occurred, no duration was registered.
Result
Experienced temporal passage requires registered sequential state transitions. Environmental change alone is insufficient. When registration is absent, experienced duration collapses to a boundary-to-boundary transition with no internal representation of passage.
Implications
This framework distinguishes between time as an ordering relation among states and time as experienced flow. The latter emerges from registration density rather than from external dynamics. Systems may therefore inhabit a temporally ordered reality without instantiating experienced duration.
Conclusion
Time-as-flow is not fundamental but emergent. It arises from how systems register change rather than from change itself. When registration is suspended, experienced time disappears, even though the structure of events remains intact.