Difficult to evaluate, with potential yellow flags.
Read full explanation
Good afternoon, I'm sharing an idea for detecting "equilibrium" and "synthesis" nodes.
I'm developing a model where each concept is a node. Given the other concepts that give meaning and coherence to the first, a network is structured where semantics generates structure.
While watching a video about laser holograms, the following idea came to me for detecting synthesis and equilibrium nodes. For example:
Warm (equilibrium concept coherent with its predecessors)
/ \
Cold--- Hot (concepts with informational coherence)
These have their synthesis in temperature, for example... this generates a 3D figure.
To find them, I've devised a Triple Interference system (p_a, p_b, p_e).
In a more philosophical example, we would have a triad like this:
Synthesis
/ \
/ \
Antithesis ---- Thesis
A node would be identified as a synthesis candidate ONLY if it aligns simultaneously with the Thesis and the Antithesis, this being the detected Equilibrium point, penalized by an asymmetry factor (λ).
At the level of "security" or self-auditing, I am developing a system that acts as an auditor. It doesn't modify or generate anything new in the graph, but it provides a geometric explanation that can be traced.
Since this isn't really my field and I came to it to validate an idea, I would like to know the opinion of people working on similar topics.
For this, I use something I've called a semantic diffraction system. This stems from a field approach that deals with concepts like wave-like influences interfering within a graph. To solve some problems I've encountered in developing my model, instead of measuring distances, I "propagate" fields of influence through the graph's structure.
The idea is to emit a "vibration" or field from two conceptual nodes that represent a duality (they maintain informational coherence, and one requires the existence of the other). For example: Cold-Heat, Darkness-Light, Negative-Positive...
(A,B)
It's worth noting that this is a directed and weighted graph G=(V,E). When I refer to a field of influence, I mean a stationary distribution obtained using diffusion with a reset from the source node or concept. Therefore, the idea is not to measure distances but rather structure.
Two nodes representing a duality are chosen, and a field is emitted from these "opposites." This is how "interference patterns" emerge... a node that could be considered an equilibrium concept would be framed within shared conceptual axes derived from the very structures of duality.
On one hand, we look at the influence of pole A (the propagation of the concept of duality, as Antithesis). On the other hand, we look at the influence of pole B (the propagation of the complementary and opposite concept, following the example: thesis).
“Synthesis” may not be directly connected to “Antithesis,”
Synthesis
/ \
Antithesis----Thesis
but at the level of structure, or what I call the geometry of meaning, it is the place where both fields converge.
Thus, the concept of conceptual equilibrium appears at the point where poles A and B balance, the central point being on an axis of duality.
Negative ---- Neutral ---- Positive
Cold ---- Warm ---- Hot
\ | /
Synthesis concept: Temperature
Equilibrium = structural balance on the X-axis
Synthesis = dimensional emergence on the Y-axis
The synthesis concept is the node that emanates from this equilibrium. generating a higher and more inclusive conceptual dimension with its predecessors: Temperature.
The model I propose is that the concept (node) of equilibrium would be the point of least asymmetry between two opposing fields, and in the case of a node that is a conceptual synthesis, this would be a distinct node that is organized around that equilibrium as a higher dimension.
In the tests I have carried out, it is able to detect structurally stable candidates when the duality generates a "coherent interference pattern."
Sorry for the metaphors... 😅 Here's the link to the paper...
Good afternoon, I'm sharing an idea for detecting "equilibrium" and "synthesis" nodes.
I'm developing a model where each concept is a node. Given the other concepts that give meaning and coherence to the first, a network is structured where semantics generates structure.
While watching a video about laser holograms, the following idea came to me for detecting synthesis and equilibrium nodes. For example:
Warm (equilibrium concept coherent with its predecessors)
/ \
Cold--- Hot (concepts with informational coherence)
These have their synthesis in temperature, for example... this generates a 3D figure.
To find them, I've devised a Triple Interference system (p_a, p_b, p_e).
In a more philosophical example, we would have a triad like this:
Synthesis
/ \
/ \
Antithesis ---- Thesis
A node would be identified as a synthesis candidate ONLY if it aligns simultaneously with the Thesis and the Antithesis, this being the detected Equilibrium point, penalized by an asymmetry factor (λ).
At the level of "security" or self-auditing, I am developing a system that acts as an auditor. It doesn't modify or generate anything new in the graph, but it provides a geometric explanation that can be traced.
Since this isn't really my field and I came to it to validate an idea, I would like to know the opinion of people working on similar topics.
For this, I use something I've called a semantic diffraction system. This stems from a field approach that deals with concepts like wave-like influences interfering within a graph. To solve some problems I've encountered in developing my model, instead of measuring distances, I "propagate" fields of influence through the graph's structure.
The idea is to emit a "vibration" or field from two conceptual nodes that represent a duality (they maintain informational coherence, and one requires the existence of the other). For example: Cold-Heat, Darkness-Light, Negative-Positive...
(A,B)
It's worth noting that this is a directed and weighted graph G=(V,E). When I refer to a field of influence, I mean a stationary distribution obtained using diffusion with a reset from the source node or concept. Therefore, the idea is not to measure distances but rather structure.
Two nodes representing a duality are chosen, and a field is emitted from these "opposites." This is how "interference patterns" emerge... a node that could be considered an equilibrium concept would be framed within shared conceptual axes derived from the very structures of duality.
On one hand, we look at the influence of pole A (the propagation of the concept of duality, as Antithesis). On the other hand, we look at the influence of pole B (the propagation of the complementary and opposite concept, following the example: thesis).
“Synthesis” may not be directly connected to “Antithesis,”
Synthesis
/ \
Antithesis----Thesis
but at the level of structure, or what I call the geometry of meaning, it is the place where both fields converge.
Thus, the concept of conceptual equilibrium appears at the point where poles A and B balance, the central point being on an axis of duality.
Negative ---- Neutral ---- Positive
Cold ---- Warm ---- Hot
\ | /
Synthesis concept: Temperature
Equilibrium = structural balance on the X-axis
Synthesis = dimensional emergence on the Y-axis
The synthesis concept is the node that emanates from this equilibrium. generating a higher and more inclusive conceptual dimension with its predecessors: Temperature.
The model I propose is that the concept (node) of equilibrium would be the point of least asymmetry between two opposing fields, and in the case of a node that is a conceptual synthesis, this would be a distinct node that is organized around that equilibrium as a higher dimension.
In the tests I have carried out, it is able to detect structurally stable candidates when the duality generates a "coherent interference pattern."
Sorry for the metaphors... 😅 Here's the link to the paper...
https://www.academia.edu/145910143/A_Structural_Approach_to_Equilibrium_and_Synthesis_DSemantic_Diffraction_in_Conceptual_Graphs_A_Structural_Approach_to_Equilibrium_and_Synthesis_Detectionetection