We are not presenting a complete theory in the traditional sense. We are presenting

something more elemental: a structural foundation upon which many theories may be

unified, interpreted, or reconstructed. This is not a proposal to replace existing frameworks,

but to expose their common origin—the invisible phase geometry that sustains their

coherence.

What is offered here is not a mechanism, but a constraint; not a new set of interactions,

but a limit condition for all systems that seek to persist in ordered form. The coherence

threshold is not a detail—it is the boundary of physical possibility. As such, it demands

recognition.

We invite theorists to re-express familiar systems—classical, quantum, relativistic—in

terms of their internal phase geometry. We invite those working in quantum information

to explore the implications for error correction, entanglement saturation, and decoherence

scaling. We invite cosmologists to revisit the early universe not as a puzzle of entropy, but

as a phase-coherent origin. We invite mathematical physicists to probe the invariants and

curvature functionals that emerge from this geometry. We invite philosophers to re-express

the ontology of time and law in terms of phase transitions, not probabilistic emergence.

This is an invitation across disciplines. To see structure not as a consequence of

equations, but as the prerequisite for their meaning. To understand coherence not as a

property, but as a limit—one that is universal, derived, and testable.

The coherence constant we identify is not an invention; it is a discovery. Its presence

across gravitational, quantum, informational, and cosmological domains is not coincidence,

but consequence. The theory offered here is a beginning, not a closure. Its equations have

been written, its derivations completed, and its predictions verified in bounded systems.

What remains is to test it where it matters most: at the interface between theories that

never before shared a language.

We do not assert that this framework answers every open question. But we assert

that it reframes the questions in terms more fundamental than have yet been considered.

And in doing so, it offers a new axis for the unification of physics—one not of force or

symmetry, but of structure.