Can two “identical” AIs develop radically different personalities even without rewards or external pressure?
In a 100-run developmental experiment I ran, the answer looks like yes. Across 100 twin runs:
• Shared neural dynamics? Mild but consistent coupling.
• Shared emotions? Near-zero correlation on average – affective trajectories diverge.
• A light reflective scaffold (HRLS) modulates this, but doesn’t erase the individuality.
Implication for AI safety: Temperament isn’t canonical. If baseline emergence is this diverse, suppression-heavy alignment may be reshaping more than we think.
Can two “identical” AIs develop radically different personalities even without rewards or external pressure?
In a 100-run developmental experiment I ran, the answer looks like yes.
Across 100 twin runs:
• Shared neural dynamics? Mild but consistent coupling.
• Shared emotions? Near-zero correlation on average – affective trajectories diverge.
• A light reflective scaffold (HRLS) modulates this, but doesn’t erase the individuality.
Implication for AI safety: Temperament isn’t canonical. If baseline emergence is this diverse, suppression-heavy alignment may be reshaping more than we think.