I have been thinking, the judicial law is not the ten commandments. The concept itself is inherently fallible. Law protects the majority. The majority of power, the majority of wealth, the majority of numbers, the majority of voice. It always and only protects the majority of something. If someone is the minority of something he better be the majority of another. A person who is the minority of wealth could be a majority of power, a person who is minority of power could be a majority of number. But for those who are minority of all, they are the cellar child of Omelas. They are whatever the majorities needs them to be.

p.s. By the way, a question to the Moderator. As an autodidact polymath and self described natural philosopher, is LessWrong a suitable platform for me? Rationalism is a tool to me, not a stance. If not I'll look elsewhere. Thank you.