Gucci Ming | v1.5.0Jul 19th 2022 | (+4/-4) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.4.0Dec 4th 2009 | (+47/-33) | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.3.0Nov 18th 2009 | (+834/-59) writing | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.2.0Nov 17th 2009 | (+60) See also | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.1.0Nov 17th 2009 | (-42) byline removal | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.0.0Jul 19th 2009 | (+158) stub |
Reality already is what it is; as aspiring rationalists, our task in thought and speech is to map it. You can't coerce reality by definingredefining a word in a particular way.word. The fact that you've defined a word in a particular way can't teach you anything about the world, only observations can. Therefore arguing by definition is futile. Worse still, the dictionary definition of a word doesn't even begin to capture the rich cognitive content that actually constitutes its meaning; the dictionary, defining a word in terms of other words, can only serve as a helpful pointer to what most people mean when they use a word. Better to keep the focus on the facts of the matter and trying to understand what your interlocutor is trying to communicate, then to get lost in a pointless discussion of definitions, bearing nothing.
Hardly any knowledgeReality already is what it is; as aspiring rationalists, our task in thought and speech is to map it. You can't coerce reality by defining a word in a particular way. The fact that you've defined a word in a particular way can't teach you anything about the world, only observations can. Therefore arguing by definition is futile. Worse still, the dictionary definition of a word doesn't even begin to capture the rich cognitive content that actually constitutes its meaning; the dictionary, defining a word in terms of other words, can be gained from arguing "by definition".only serve as a helpful pointer to what most people mean when they use a word. Better to keep the focus on the facts of the matter and trying to understand what your interlocutor is trying to communicate, then to get lost in a pointless discussion of definitions, bearing nothing.
Hardly any knowledge can be gained from arguing "by definition".
Reality already is what it is; as aspiring rationalists, our task in thought and speech is to map it. You can't coerce reality by redefining a word. The fact that you've defined a word in a particular way can't teach you anything about the world, only observations can. Therefore arguing by definition is futile. Worse still, the dictionary definition of a word doesn't even begin to capture the rich cognitive content that actually constitutes its meaning; the dictionary, defining a word in terms of other words, can only serve as a helpful pointer to what most people mean when they use a word. Better to keep the focus on the facts of the matter and trying to understand what your interlocutor is trying to communicate,
thenthan to get lost in a pointless discussion of definitions, bearing nothing.