What do you think about emotions of sideload - a mind model of person created via promoting of current large LLM? Is it just soulless roleplaying? Or we should care anyway?

Not sure if it is a relevant question, but I heard that LLMs now can follow no more than 150 rules in a prompt simultaneously and good following is to 50. This lowers complexity of adversarial plots. Do you know anything about it?

You need the second universe to be sure that the target mind is generated somewhere and this high enough measure. 

I recreated Roman Mazurenko based on public data - and he runs locally on Claude Code. But he is interested in questions from real people. 

This one is generated by Opus 4.5 based on my hand-made map. I asked it to give plausible probabilities. At first glance they are rather plausible as a prior. My main view is that both rare earth theory and late great filter are valid and as result the nearest grabby aliens are around 1 billion light years from us. 

My goal was to list all possible solutions here, but not to estimate them. However, in the really great post by Lukas there is a Monte Carlo model of distribution of different values in the Drake equation which creates two hills - one hill is ( as I understand the post) for all of the parameters are close to 1 habitable planet per star and another is 10exp(-100) where at least one is extremely low. This, however, is compensated by anthropic considerations which favor maximal concentration of habitable planets. 

I don't see eukaryotes as a really hard step as symbiosis between cells seems a logical step. 

Space travel in the dust may be solved by use of needle-like nanotechnological starships. They also can self-repair if collide small dust particles or gas. As we can see remote stars, most straight lines to them are dust free so the problems can be solvable. An alternative is sending heavy Orion-like nuclear ships and limit their speed to 0.1c. Heavy ship can carry heavy protection ahead it. 

 

I am still better than AI in reading (my) handwriting

See here AI-updated version of the map which includes probabilities and Global vs Local solution distinctions. If you press on any text it will provide more detailed explanation. But this AI-version may have subtle errors. Probabilities are AI-generated and just illustrative. 
https://avturchin.github.io/OpenSideloading/fermi_v11_en_interactive.html 

Click of the word pdf in above the map: "Fermi paradox solutions map, pdf "
and it should show pdf with links.