LESSWRONG
LW

929
Malmesbury
238025840
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

https://malmesbury.substack.com

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
5Malmesbury's Shortform
3y
4
Maybe Social Anxiety Is Just You Failing At Mind Control
Malmesbury10d30

I had the impression while reading that, at some point during the FAQ you stopped caring and had fun writing, and I thought this illustrated the point of the post pretty nicely.

Reply
Halfhaven virtual blogger camp
Malmesbury13d20

It no longer works!

Reply
Halfhaven virtual blogger camp
Malmesbury13d20

I just found out about this and want to join (probably just for quarter-haven, like Rauno), but the discord link is expired. Can I still join?

Reply
So how well is Claude playing Pokémon?
Malmesbury8mo30

Doesn't Claude's training data include all the tutorials and step by step walkthroughs of this game ever published on the internet? How is it not using this information?

Reply
How AI Takeover Might Happen in 2 Years
Malmesbury8mo30

In the sequel: the mirror mold evolves into intelligent life, develops a brain on its own, and threatens to take over the world. U3 begrudgingly sends an ambassador to the human city to collect samples of mirror-mirror-pathogens.

Reply
Language Models Use Trigonometry to Do Addition
Malmesbury9mo30

That's impressive work! Out of curiosity, how long did it take to figure all of this out?

Reply
Mechanisms too simple for humans to design
Malmesbury9mo20

Putting error-correction codes in the genetic code is an interesting idea. In the context of the Pikachu thought experiment, though, here what I think would happen in the long run: because of the drift barrier, evolution can't distinguish between a ~1/N error rate and a zero error rate. So, there's nothing to prevent the rest of the machinery to become less accurate, until the error rate reaches 1/N after error correction. Now that I think about, you could probably keep things in control by systematically sequencing the genes for the replication machinery and breeding based on that. There is a spark of hope.

Reply
Mechanisms too simple for humans to design
Malmesbury9mo20

Oh yeah, I mean to compare things that have the same functionality (e.g. human-made butterfly robot vs natural butterfly). Obviously shovels are more simple than butterflies. But, seeing stuff like the wax motor and other examples people have posted, humans are definitely capable of coming up with great simple mechanisms, and I underestimated that. Thanks for bringing it up.

Reply
Mechanisms too simple for humans to design
Malmesbury9mo20

Kudos for taking the challenge! If I understand correctly, your first point is actually pretty similar to how E. coli follows gradients of nutrients, even when the scale of the gradient is much larger than the size of a cell.

Reply
Survival without dignity
Malmesbury10mo40

You might enjoy this story I wrote a few months ago, also about AI doom and also set in the future: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BgTsxMq5bgzKTLsLA/this-is-already-your-second-chance

Reply
Load More
51Making sense of parameter-space decomposition
1mo
0
211Mechanisms too simple for humans to design
9mo
45
194This is already your second chance
1y
13
383There is way too much serendipity
2y
57
532The Talk: a brief explanation of sexual dimorphism
2y
77
40Reverse-correlation: how to summon the ghost of your mental imagery
3y
0
71It's time to worry about online privacy again
3y
23
5Malmesbury's Shortform
3y
4
10Football, quantum chromodynamics, figure skating and statistics
3y
1
21The computational complexity of progress
3y
2
Load More