Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines:
• interesting, insightful, useful
• aim to explain, not to persuade
• avoid meta discussion
• relevant to people whether or not they
are involved with the LessWrong community.
I like the way you've started thinking about this.
You haven't addressed why we take on identities in the first place. Calling on a [chesterton's fence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence) - what makes you think people will want to change without knowing why identity ...(read more)
Yes. The last half hour is where everything solidifies. Also you can watch in double speed.
! Test - it's >!
Reminds me of nvc (https://youtu.be/l7TONauJGfc) and the way it encourages you to communicate the needs behind the request. Not just the request.
Spammmmm
whether hiding Eugine’s deleted comments is good for me
yeah. I can see how you might want to make that decision for yourself. In which case you can probably try to get in touch with this person off platform.
I give Mods the permission to sometimes make these decisions for the users.
To be clear. I'm talking about only the E comments. The rest should be in a log.
And I think of it as protecting LW from a persistent bad actor. Despite multiple attempts to ask for them to join mediation or talk about what the problem is or even do anything other than repost the same text o...(read more)
E was banned. That decision is locked in.
Consequences of being banned include - you don't get to post here and people don't get to read your comments. Even in a moderation log.
seems reasonable to me. (including also tags in comment text if necessary)
I like the way you've started thinking about this. You haven't addressed why we take on identities in the first place. Calling on a [chesterton's fence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence) - what makes you think people will want to change without knowing why identity ...(read more)
Yes. The last half hour is where everything solidifies. Also you can watch in double speed.
Reminds me of nvc (https://youtu.be/l7TONauJGfc) and the way it encourages you to communicate the needs behind the request. Not just the request.
Spammmmm
yeah. I can see how you might want to make that decision for yourself. In which case you can probably try to get in touch with this person off platform.
I give Mods the permission to sometimes make these decisions for the users.
To be clear. I'm talking about only the E comments. The rest should be in a log. And I think of it as protecting LW from a persistent bad actor. Despite multiple attempts to ask for them to join mediation or talk about what the problem is or even do anything other than repost the same text o...(read more)
E was banned. That decision is locked in.
Consequences of being banned include - you don't get to post here and people don't get to read your comments. Even in a moderation log.
seems reasonable to me. (including also tags in comment text if necessary)
You can go talk to them not on lw.