Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines:
• interesting, insightful, useful
• aim to explain, not to persuade
• avoid meta discussion
• relevant to people whether or not they
are involved with the LessWrong community.
Consider writing a week's worth and releasing them as a chunk. (still write every day)
Interested to see what you think. Maybe worth writing a, "before this post I expect...." and, "after this post I think...".
This would benefit from a diagram or a table.
Or you could start a new branch.
are the points:
A, 0 || A, not B Not A, B || B, 0
Or:
A, not B || A, B Not A, Not B || not A, B
?
Diagrams disagree with each other and don't seem to follow a pattern.
Sad and not happy.
Happy and not sad.
Should exist on that diagram.
This is going to go better if you delete that last line.
You don't make friends with accusations. You don't do collaborative truth seeking with adversarial accusations.
The problem is not politics, it's identity politics. I'm not a libertarian, I'm not an anarchist. I'm not a communist, I'm n...(read more)
Guess: Antisocial opinion. Potentially promoting/endorsing causing suffering to the "victim".
I do the best I can. This sometimes means writing for hours at a time and sometimes means the equivalent of catching pictures.
It's not helpful for me to be self critical either way because I am aware that I already do the best I can do.
We need to encourage edit culture. Maybe bringing old posts to the top of the post list when edited. Or an optional checkbox to do so. Maybe we need a second feed for renewed content.
I will think about the tools needed to help edit culture develop.
Sometimes it's cheaper to fake status than to pay the costly signals of status like becoming a professional natural therapist instead of doing a medical degree to become a doctor.
Because of that the people trying to measure trust/value have to develop better ways at measuring the difference betw...(read more)
Consider writing a week's worth and releasing them as a chunk. (still write every day)
Interested to see what you think. Maybe worth writing a, "before this post I expect...." and, "after this post I think...".
This would benefit from a diagram or a table.
Or you could start a new branch.
are the points:
A, 0 || A, not B
Not A, B || B, 0
Or:
A, not B || A, B
Not A, Not B || not A, B
?
Diagrams disagree with each other and don't seem to follow a pattern.
Sad and not happy. Happy and not sad.
Should exist on that diagram.
This is going to go better if you delete that last line. You don't make friends with accusations. You don't do collaborative truth seeking with adversarial accusations. The problem is not politics, it's identity politics. I'm not a libertarian, I'm not an anarchist. I'm not a communist, I'm n...(read more)
Guess: Antisocial opinion. Potentially promoting/endorsing causing suffering to the "victim".
I do the best I can. This sometimes means writing for hours at a time and sometimes means the equivalent of catching pictures.
It's not helpful for me to be self critical either way because I am aware that I already do the best I can do.
We need to encourage edit culture. Maybe bringing old posts to the top of the post list when edited. Or an optional checkbox to do so. Maybe we need a second feed for renewed content.
I will think about the tools needed to help edit culture develop.
Sometimes it's cheaper to fake status than to pay the costly signals of status like becoming a professional natural therapist instead of doing a medical degree to become a doctor. Because of that the people trying to measure trust/value have to develop better ways at measuring the difference betw...(read more)