As a second opinion, claim's would indeed be helpful. Facts would also be beneficial, speaking of which I feel as though having a post type similar to claims for facts would be great. But instead of there being a (dis)agree spectrum, there's a likelihood of that fact being true spectrum.

Are there going to be visual explanations put here for the examples? I found that quite helpful in the former pages. I'd say this is the first part of the new Bayes Guide that feels very similar (in terms of clarity) to the old one. Although, I might be biased as I've found I much prefer visual explanations of things.