As a second opinion, claim's would indeed be helpful. Facts would also be beneficial, speaking of which I feel as though having a post type similar to claims for facts would be great. But instead of there being a (dis)agree spectrum, there's a likelihood of that fact being true spectrum.
I think that would definitely capture a big part of it. There are also fun facts that are interesting to know, e.g.: Trump's spokesman Jason Miller said Trump's claim that there were millions of illegal voters was based on a column in The Washington Post.
What if it was tagged with claims? Would that give you what you're wanting from a summary? I feel much more able to tag a post with claims than I am able to write a summary of the post.
As a second opinion, claim's would indeed be helpful. Facts would also be beneficial, speaking of which I feel as though having a post type similar to claims for facts would be great. But instead of there being a (dis)agree spectrum, there's a likelihood of that fact being true spectrum.
Definitely have a strong feeling of wanting to read a summary instead of the entire article.
I think that would definitely capture a big part of it. There are also fun facts that are interesting to know, e.g.: Trump's spokesman Jason Miller said Trump's claim that there were millions of illegal voters was based on a column in The Washington Post.
What if it was tagged with claims? Would that give you what you're wanting from a summary? I feel much more able to tag a post with claims than I am able to write a summary of the post.