User Profile

star0
description88
message875

Recent Posts

Curated Posts
starCurated - Recent, high quality posts selected by the LessWrong moderation team.
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Frontpage Posts
Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines: • interesting, insightful, useful • aim to explain, not to persuade • avoid meta discussion • relevant to people whether or not they are involved with the LessWrong community.
(includes curated content and frontpage posts)
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Personal Blogposts
personPersonal blogposts by LessWrong users (as well as curated and frontpage).
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed

Video using humor to spread rationality

1y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Irrationality is the worst problem in politics

1y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
1

Major Life Course Change: Making Politics Less Irrational

1y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
6

[Link] Raising the sanity waterline in politics

1y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

[Link] Voting is like donating hundreds of thousands to charity

1y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
45

[Link] Tech behemoths form artificial-intelligence nonprofit

2y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

A Weird Trick To Manage Your Identity

2y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
14

Recent Comments

I have plenty of social status, and sufficient money, as a professor. I don't need any more personally. In fact, I've donated about $38K to charity over the last 2 years. My goal is EA ends. You can choose to believe me or not :-)

Never claimed to be - I have long argued for the most effective communication techniques to promote EA ends.

I don't believe I am wrong here. My rich uncle doesn't read Less Wrong. However, those who have rich uncles do read Less Wrong. If I can sway even a single individual to communicate effectively, as opposed to maximizing transparency, in swaying people to give money effectively, I'll be glad to have ...(read more)

You seem to be suggesting that I had previously advocated being as transparent as possible. On the contrary - I have long advocated for the most effective communication techniques to achieve EA ends.

Sarah's post highlights some of the essential tensions at the heart of Effective Altruism.

Do we care about "doing the most good that we can" or "being as transparent and honest as we can"? These are two different value sets. They will sometimes overlap, and in other cases will not.

And please d...(read more)

This is probably too complex to hash out in comments - lots of semantics issues and some strategic/tactical information that might be best to avoid discussing publicly. If you're interested in getting involved in the project and want to chat on Skype, email me at gleb [at] intentionalinsights [dot] ...(read more)

We chose the issue of lies specifically because it is something a bunch of people can get behind opposing, across the political spectrum. Otherwise, we have to choose political virtues, and it's always a trade-off. So the two fundamental orientations of this project are utilitarianism and anti-lies....(read more)

Agreed with the issues around measuring lies, and noting the concession of the point - LW gold to you for highlighting the concession.

I hear you about "rationalism in politics." The public-facing aspect of this project will be using terms like "post-lies movement" and so on. We're using "Rational Politics" as the internal and provisional name for now, while we are gathering allies and spreading word about the project rather than d...(read more)