rmoehn

rmoehn's Comments

What are some things you would do (more) if you were less averse to being/looking weird?

Wear only swim briefs all through the summer, except when sun protection is needed. – Saves laundry and air conditioning. Requires great tolerance for being/looking weird.

How I do research

These are great suggestions for the thinking part of doing research.

For people who have difficulty with the first part – finding a good problem – I recommend the classic The Craft of Research. It also has practical guidance about writing down your results.

Predicted AI alignment event/meeting calendar

I don't understand. Would you like to have the September 2020 event at the top?

Maybe what is most relevant to you differs from what is most relevant to me. I delete all past events, which limits the ‘irrelevant stuff’. And most relevant to me are the events that are soonest.

Predicted AI alignment event/meeting calendar

I can't imagine a good format with new content at the top. But I will add markers, so people can quickly scan for changes. I assume that's why you asked?

rmoehn's Shortform

Updated the Prediced AI alignment event/meeting calendar.

Main change: Deadline for SafeAI workshop corrected to November from December.

Multi-belled Brass

Watch the last linked video and listen to the opinion, then form your own. You might come to the same conclusion. :-)

By the way, I'm German and as a child I liked to hear the Schalmeienkapelle of my village play. If I heard them live these days, however, I might want to get out of earshot quickly. Then again, it might take time to develop an appreciation. The strangest musical styles exist around the world.

Looking for remote writing partners (for AI alignment research)

Cool. Then we're three so far. I'll wait until tomorrow for more responses. Then I'll get back to the responders to schedule a time.

Looking for remote writing partners (for AI alignment research)

I would get together with anyone and see how it works out. If the differences in knowledge or topics cause discontent or other problems, we call it quits. Stricter criteria I can't set, because I don't have any experience with writing groups. And when it comes to knowledge of ML/math/research, I'm at a rather low level. Which isn't to say that I'm a complete nitwit. My main achievements are just in other areas.

A cognitive intervention for wrist pain

Thanks for writing this! It's good to see more sceptical approach. Do you have any more recommendations for reading on the subject?

Not really, sorry. Wacky old Sarno did the job for me, so I didn't look further. Then I took what rational argument I could find and put it in the above article. However, for the people who think that the human body is easily broken, I'll repeat one recommendation from above: Through the Valley by Col. William Reeder.

EDIT: Another recommendation: When I have sports-related issues, I treat them with recommendations from Becoming a Supple Leopard by Kelly Starrett. And when this doesn't fix it, I call one of the PTs at what used to be MobilityWOD. Apparently they've changed their branding to ‘The Ready State’.

I've had RSI for five years now. I read Sarno, tried the Curable app, and tried on the hypothesis that my pain was psychosomatic. For my case, the benefit I've got from a more psychosomatic approach is to try to form fewer negative associations with the pain. I used to view the pain as an indication that my body was broken and that I was ruined. Now I still have the pain, but I have much less of that secondary psychological reaction to the pain, and that's greatly improved my life.

I've heard a similar story from a friend with chronic fatigue. Good for you!

[…] In my estimation, this article and other arguments that RSI is psychosomatic move too quickly from (true) evidence that chronic pain is a weird and mysterious to the claim that it must be psychosomatic.

I'm not saying that all RSI is psychosomatic. Sorry for not being clear. I just know that my case was psychosomatic, so I assume that it's psychosomatic for a certain unknown percentage of wrist pain sufferers.

My reasoning is this: I had severe wrist pain. And the physical remedies I tried didn't work. I read a book that gave me a few ideas and "thought remedies" and the pain went away. And it's been staying away for years, no matter how much I type. (As I mentioned in the article, I get occasional slight, which pains I attribute to stress and which go away quickly.) As the psychological change led to a physical change, I conclude that I've had psychosomatic pain. And since it's unlikely that only I had it this way, I conclude that there must be other sufferers of psychosomatic wrist pain.

The pain being ‘weird’ is not required for my argument. There is one paragraph mentioning ‘strange’ pain, but that's just one of my handwavy diagnostic criteria, not an antecedent.

I worry that saying that RSI is psychosomatic feels like it explains the condition, but really doesn't explain it very well. I like that in your post you make some predictions based on your hypothesis.

I'm not aware of any satisfying explanation. I just know that changing my mind somehow cured my pain, so I call it ‘psychosomatic’.

Actually I make another prediction in the comments: ‘If stress causes wrist pain and people stress out, because they think that typing is bad for them, wrist pain should be "contagious". Take an office full of workers who are doing fine. Then one starts having wrist pain for whatever reason, finds online warnings about RSI, tells their colleagues, they get worried about their work being harmful for them, and some of them also start having wrist pain.’

It would be informative to make a study of the EA and rationality communities and see if we find a contagion pattern. I thought about doing it myself, but my intuitions are stuck in the ‘RSI is psychosomatic’ camp. So I would just be seeing evidence the way I want to see it.

My impression is that the hypothesis of myofascial trigger points has better evidence and does a better job of explaining cases of RSI, and many people who argue that RSI is largely psychosomatic are not aware of the theory of myofascial trigger points.

This might be the explanation for the physical cases. I have skimmed the page on trigger points. And what you write about the foam roller and the lacrosse ball sounds like what I'm doing when I've messed up some body part with poor weightlifting form. This works well, even though I wouldn't explain the weightlifting pains with trigger points.

Another thing I'd like to warn against is trusting the ‘pleasurable feeling of pain’. Doing this, I once (or twice?) seriously messed up the muscles under my shoulder blade and later aggravated my elbow joint. All healed, though.

I should note that I'm probably biased against the hypothesis that RSI is largely psychosomatic. This is because it feels like the hypothesis trivializes my condition. Of course, I think this bias is silly, but I think I do still have it.

Trivializes it how? I wouldn't consider psychosomatic issues trivial at all. In fact, it's terrible that a mostly reasonable person like me can be kicked into a vicious circle of stress and pain by well-reputed and well-intended information from family, friends or the web. This is why I want to change the communication around wrist pain: help the people with purely physical pain, but don't make it worse for those with a penchant for psychosomatic issues.

I also wonder if this bias could explain why I haven't got benefit from a psychosomatic approach to my RSI. I do certainly seem to meet the psychological profile of people who are susceptible to psychosomatic pain I've heard described in books and media such as Sarno's.

I guess I'm the opposite. Sarno's arguments somehow made it into my brain to a degree sufficient to get rid of the pain. And being ‘magically’ cured this way has reinforced the psychosomatic hypothesis to a point where a "PSYCHOSOMATIC" neon sign pops up in my head whenever I hear about a mysterious, unexplained condition. Which in turn shuts down the mechanisms that originally caused the pain.

Of course, when I write about this, I try to shield my eyes from the neon sign and concentrate on established facts.

Just for fun (and not for argument, please), here's a little rave from the troupe that's providing the electricity for the neon sign:

Overuse injury from typing on a keyboard? Maybe. It is an awkward movement. But it appears absurd to me that using a mouse would lead to overuse injuries. Come on! We open and close our hands all day long, and flex our fingers with much greater force than is required for a click. And think of all the repetitive (handcraft) activities that people had to do in the past! Typing on mechanical typewriters, playing musical instruments, copying books by hand, grinding grain with a stone, knitting, sewing, spinning, weaving baskets and cloth, weeding, picking berries, making arrows, ropes and fishing nets, planing, sawing, cutting, hacking, thatching, carving, filing…

Heck, if typing was so bad for you, shouldn't half the secretaries of the mechanical typewriter era have fallen out of the workforce within three years?

I've written this post with my recommendations for treatment here. I have a section on the psychological component to RSI, but I don't discuss the hypothesis that RSI could be more or less entirely psychosomatic.

I saw that section and I'm happy that it's there. Thank you!

Load More