RELATIVE ANSWER

The yes or no answer is multi-dimensional. Not only from a certain point of view, but broadly there are certain aspects of achievement and certain failures, so that from a time point of view, currently there are two answers in different contexts.

YES, because many people use calculus mathematics to calculate changes

NO, because mathematics cannot yet reconcile general relativity & quantum mechanics

When you ask for a definitive answer, I also have to answer objectively. And that's a close to objective answer. Why?

In a level of causality. It has a degree of functionality that gives different results (between yes or no)

So in this case I answered objectively.

DEFINITE ANSWER

UNLESS THE QUESTION ABOUT ABSOLUTE UNIVERSAL TRUTH, there has to be a definite answer (YES OR NO)

There must be as part of a process, but basically it can be solved in the sense that mathematic essential in physics for formulating theories, making predictions, and quantifying relationships between variables

But not for philosophy in the sense that philosophy mostly abstract, not objective

Somehow philosophy must have its own formula, a rational & objective statement(s), so there won't be a gap in between philosophy to both (mathematic & physics)

Please don't just downvote based on karma or other values, as this is still something new. Downvoting might not be beneficial for ongoing discussions where we could potentially inspire each other without stopping in unnecessary mid-discussion.

Feel free to discuss for days; it's better than rushing to judgment.