User Profile

star16
description7
message240

Recent Posts

Curated Posts
starCurated - Recent, high quality posts selected by the LessWrong moderation team.
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Frontpage Posts
Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines: • interesting, insightful, useful • aim to explain, not to persuade • avoid meta discussion • relevant to people whether or not they are involved with the LessWrong community.
(includes curated content and frontpage posts)
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
All Posts
personIncludes personal and meta blogposts (as well as curated and frontpage).
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed

Meetup : Gen Con: Applied Game Theory

2y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
4

Meetup : Ann Arbor meetup

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
5

Meetup : Gen Con: Applied Game Theory

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
5

Michigan Meetup Feedback and Planning

3y
2 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
3

Meetup : Ann Arbor, MI Discussion Meetup 6/13

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
2

Choosing an Inferior Alternative

3y
2 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
3

Defeating the Villain

3y
2 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
34

Recent Comments

And then I scroll down and find this, the perfect example of your question about books that can be initially amazing but not great upon re-read or reflection. If you are not familiar with the ideas in GEB, it can be an amazing introduction that opens new horizons. Or it can be too clever for its own...(read more)

Frequently to both.

For fiction that I re-read and find it not as good the second time, I suspect the newness of it was the driving force in my initial assessment. *Permutation City* was life-changing for me, but going back after having more transhumanism in my diet, I don't know that it is even my...(read more)

You should be very surprised if you think you have found a new counterexample to a centuries-old discipline that comes from a millennia-old example. Odds are there is an existing literature addressing exactly that question.

I concur on "do what I want" as the distinction. Magic is teleological: it produces a certain effect, whereas science is about the cause. Magic "just works." You do not need to know how the magic words produce light or fire, they just do. The great usual magical dream is about having massive power u...(read more)

And the direction of the error was known and stated in advance by informed interpreters (538). A fair number of Trump voters would not have been considered "likely" voters based on past non-voting, and that was a systematic bias in the polling estimate rather than something that would affect a few s...(read more)

Between Halls B and E, nearish giant Pikachu

Setting up at the blue Fantasy Flight tables, by the X-Wing Miniatures banner, in front of the HQ table, just before the banner showing the switch to Asmodee.

If you have spotted a good/better location at the con, suggestions are still open. Otherwise, I will be updating on-site when I arrive on Saturday.

Default location is in the card game area, specific location to be found at the time (and then posted here). There are always open tables. I would plan on near-ish the exhibit hall exit, but I have not seen how the layout may have changed this year.

There is also the official [open gaming space](ht...(read more)

There is some small number of people whom I trust when they say they very confident. They can explain the reasons why they came to a belief and the counterarguments. Most other highly confident statements I look upon with suspicion, and I might even take the confidence as evidence against the claim....(read more)