I've browsed through a bunch of topics on RationalWiki, and it looks like a heavily ideological website. Thus, it tends to be extremely unreliable and biased on any topic that has even the slightest whiff of controversy. Anyone who makes a genuine effort to form an accurate view of the world will surely come to have at least some beliefs that will be met with scorn and sneering by the sort of people who write on RW.
Well, that's one I haven't heard before. What precise examples were you thinking of?
3Bugmaster
Hmm, really ? Can you offer some examples ? I've browsed some of the articles on the site, and they didn't strike me as unduly biased -- unless snark counts as bias. But then again, I'm not sure what you mean by "controversial"; some topics, such as creationism or global warming, are controversial in mainstream culture, but fairly mundane here on Less Wrong.
I am not sure whether this has been posted here before but I came across this: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/LessWrong
What do you think about RationalWiki in general, and their opinion regarding LW?