If you have a government which constantly redistributes money you could hold it constant if you wanted to do so. But the people with whom I spoke usually don't go that far. Concerns are rather that everyone has access to a "living wage".
Defining how exactly the end state will look like isn't that much of a concern if you can decide whether or not you move in the right direction. There the feeling that third way policies of cutting government pensions don't go in that direction.
If you have a government which constantly redistributes money you could hold it constant if you wanted to do so.
Yes, but that's not exactly compatible with anything resembling freedom.
Concerns are rather that everyone has access to a "living wage".
The problem is what's considered a "living wage" changes with changes in society.
Defining how exactly the end state will look like isn't that much of a concern if you can decide whether or not you move in the right direction.
It is a concern if you want to evaluate whether you should even be trying to move in that direction.
Another month has passed and here is a new rationality quotes thread. The usual rules are:
And one new rule: