There are a lot of generally relevant points about when/how to trust experts, not specific to cryonics.
I think it does a really good job at explaining how to identify the relevant experts in cryonics to help you assess the value of current and potential cryonics.
It has a list of interesting famous wrong predictions 'experts' made.
Here's the table of content:
Whose expertise is relevant to evaluating cryonics?
Your comment creates a misleading impression of my article. Nowhere do I say experts can give a point probability of success. On the contrary, I frequently reject that idea. I also find it silly when people say the probably of AI destroying humans is 20%, or 45%, or whatever.
You don't provide any support for the claim that "the rest of the article doesn't hold all that well together", so I'm unable to respond usefully.
I really liked the recent essay Who are the Experts on Cryonics? by Max More.
Here's why I think you might like this article:
Here's the table of content: