Ahhh, yep, thanks
Yeah that makes sense
I feel like this is something different; X isn't proven true or false here -- we just prove that if X then Y, and then also if ~Y then ~X
Woops, I meant 1,000*X
Ah, I actually had just came up with that one (am now realizing "original" wasn't the right word for this one) -- thanks for bringing up this "paradox"!
I feel like this one was presented as a clash of 2 intuitions, so both the "reversed" is also in the original presentation.
keyword to search: lexical threshold negative hedonistic utilitarianism